Disagree. I reckon there's still some blokes called Longmire, Hinkley and A.Richardson who are being considered too. Maybe another little smoky in W.Campbell. The field is still pretty wide and strong. Here's hoping Mr.Cameron's process can weed us out the best prospect.Tigers2011 said:It now looks to me that we have a choice between Buckley and Sheedy unless another left field (e.g. Clarkson type) candidate emerges.
I think there will be plenty considered, but when the short list is drawn up it will be between the two mentioned. If an alternate shows up through the process, then so be it. As long as it's the best person for the job, I'll be satisfied.hopper said:Disagree. I reckon there's still some blokes called Longmire, Hinkley and A.Richardson who are being considered too. Maybe another little smoky in W.Campbell. The field is still pretty wide and strong. Here's hoping Mr.Cameron's process can weed us out the best prospect.
Tigers2011 said:Report that I've had from a Hawthorn contact is that Hardwick is a good assistant coach but maybe not sharp enough to be a head coach - certainly not in the same league as Clarkson. Therefore I've gone off him as an option for us.
In the light of the Port decision to keep Williams,Its fair to say that perhaps there is some concerns about Hardwick.Dyer Disciple said:Not something I wanted to read, that's one of my concerns about Hardwick.
Do you guys actually think that the club will approach Sheedy to join the interview process? I have a feeling that they will not. And from what Sheedy said yesterday I doubt he will approach the club either.Tigers2011 said:Report that I've had from a Hawthorn contact is that Hardwick is a good assistant coach but maybe not sharp enough to be a head coach - certainly not in the same league as Clarkson. Therefore I've gone off him as an option for us.
It now looks to me that we have a choice between Buckley and Sheedy unless another left field (e.g. Clarkson type) candidate emerges. The fact that Bartlett has come out strongly about Sheedy may also reflect broader views of the past players/officials.
The key thing for the club to do is stick to the process, identify the best candidates and properly assess/interview each of them to arrive at the correct choice - whoever that may be. This appointment is absolutely crucial to not just the future success of the club, but also to its survival as a Melbourne based club.
The past 25 years of one on-field calamity after another has to stop here. Rebuild recruiting; rebuild player development and employ the best coaching staff possible.
Smoking Aces said:Do you guys actually think that the club will approach Sheedy to join the interview process? I have a feeling that they will not. And from what Sheedy said yesterday I doubt he will approach the club either.
Agree with DD - if the club undertake this role properly, they should talk to/assess Sheedy. They'd be negligent if they didn't. The job is to assess all available and qualified candidates and come up with the best option. In Sheedy's case, it shouldn't solely rely on who approaches whom.Smoking Aces said:Do you guys actually think that the club will approach Sheedy to join the interview process? I have a feeling that they will not. And from what Sheedy said yesterday I doubt he will approach the club either.
No doubt that they should approach him. Like you said if they are genuine about this exhaustive process Sheedy would be on their list. Just have the feeling that 'egos' might prevent this from happening.Dyer Disciple said:I'm inclined to think you are right, but if they are being as "exhaustive" as indicated they should.
Smoking Aces said:No doubt that they should approach him. Like you said if they are genuine about this exhaustive process Sheedy would be on their list. Just have the feeling that 'egos' might prevent this from happening.