Looks like a dry june/july for TBR...Game, wife was in the bed.
Looks like a dry june/july for TBR...Game, wife was in the bed.
Great call CT. Watching games live is far more enjoyable than on TV. I get to most games as I don’t live to far from the G, plus I have teenage son who loves his footy.One thing I will say about going to the game.
You do see a lot more. I just watched the replay. It's like watching two different games.
Kmac doesn't look as good on TV. And it didn't do Prestia or Baker's games justice. It's really obvious when a player wins a critical contest because you can see avenues to Goal. Grimes is another that you only feel the real impact of at the ground.
Bolton looked better on TV because you couldn't see the options he had. Also Cotchy looked much slower at the ground.
But more than that, you don't see the movement. You can't see how much we swamped Port in that first quarter, or how much pressure we can apply when we ratchet up.
For the purists, it really is worth going. Plus, it's like getting to watch two Richmond games a round.
Yep, for sure members who go to game should be a central focus. I do think the logic of the Thursday night game was to make sure people taking an extra long weekend had their 'friday night' game, and to get an extra night game in before everyone moves on to other things over the weekend.Yep true loyal members are us who go every week and we are the ones who’ve been *smile* on, now that’s not saying other members aren’t true loyal members like the many of you from all over the planet , I think your just been pedantic as it’s clear what my point is and in no way is it disrespectful ,I have a Tiger mate who lives in Washington DC and he says Thursday night or any other day or night dosent matter for him because he “tapes” the games due to been at work or it’s the middle of the night , for us who go every week , it’s just a shocking night of the week for most people to get too, it’s not the end of the world but as we’ve both said it’s for TV . Like it or not midweek games are shitting on the people who go every week , no it dosent make you a lesser supporter and it obviously suits a lot of people who just watch AFL on TV
I don’t buy the International brand , anything out of Australia in development has just been a money pit, but that’s whole different discussion
Richmond football club is big because of a lot of reasons and I certainly don’t want to take anything away from Tiges who don’t go to games , however one thing for sure though is if we didn’t have loyal Richmond members going to the games every week ,we’d be a lot more like Norf then the Mighty club we are . Many many of us sacrifice plenty to go to games live , just as others sacrifice seeing the Tiges live for other things in life , it’s the choices we make and as I said without regular footy goers going week in week out the gameand the clubs die
sorry I should have mentioned part of my beef with us getting these Thursday night games is the fact Essendon ( 16th) on the ladder in this wonderful floating fixture ( fabulous idea for the loyal travellers) get 3 prime time Friday night games in a row
Watching footy from a side angle is about as informative as watching golf from side on. Footy is perfect for picture in picture, with the 'down the ground' view in the corner and switching between the two - or having 2 TV's, with one down the ground. We had the ability to do this in the past, not sure why it can't still be a thing. Or can it?One thing I will say about going to the game.
You do see a lot more. I just watched the replay. It's like watching two different games.
Kmac doesn't look as good on TV. And it didn't do Prestia or Baker's games justice. It's really obvious when a player wins a critical contest because you can see avenues to Goal. Grimes is another that you only feel the real impact of at the ground.
Bolton looked better on TV because you couldn't see the options he had. Also Cotchy looked much slower at the ground.
But more than that, you don't see the movement. You can't see how much we swamped Port in that first quarter, or how much pressure we can apply when we ratchet up.
For the purists, it really is worth going. Plus, it's like getting to watch two Richmond games a round.
I hate that. Can’t they get their own bed?Game, wife was in the bed.
Um, with all due respects, go *smile* yourself. Wasn't aware you made the rules on what constituted a Tiger fan.Congratulations to everyone who turned up tonight!! For the rest of the so called army making excuses about the cold !! Poor form!!! Do our boys deserve a 20k crowd after 3 flags ? Embarrassing!!!
What a load of....Tigers have had 4 games over 60k. Leading the attendances per game of any club. Tiger supporters are the best. If you want to have a crack at embarrassment checkout Rd 6 crowds at 6 games.Congratulations to everyone who turned up tonight!! For the rest of the so called army making excuses about the cold !! Poor form!!! Do our boys deserve a 20k crowd after 3 flags ? Embarrassing!!!
How did you get your prediction so wrong?I was surprised we got 20,000, I thought it would be around 17,000.
How did you get your prediction so wrong?
One thing I will say about going to the game.
You do see a lot more. I just watched the replay. It's like watching two different games.
Kmac doesn't look as good on TV. And it didn't do Prestia or Baker's games justice. It's really obvious when a player wins a critical contest because you can see avenues to Goal. Grimes is another that you only feel the real impact of at the ground.
Bolton looked better on TV because you couldn't see the options he had. Also Cotchy looked much slower at the ground.
But more than that, you don't see the movement. You can't see how much we swamped Port in that first quarter, or how much pressure we can apply when we ratchet up.
For the purists, it really is worth going. Plus, it's like getting to watch two Richmond games a round.
Geez, tough gig being the Grandpa. Buy the kid a pushy n tell him to pull the finger out 'coz you've got important retired Grandpa type stuff to do, like watching footy n having a quiet sip.Couldn't go even if I wanted too, had a 4.30 am wake up to take 17yr old Grandson to work experience job.
I know, I know, poor excuse but Thems the breaks.
Just about every decision the AFL make is for television, broadcast rights, money making, and media exposure.
Nuffin wrong with AFL chasing TV rights. It's how the AFL go about it that sucks!I know it's not a popular view but the AFL is correct to look after the TV rights because it subsidises everything else in the game.
When you look at it as a comparison with other sports and major events most things around AFL are pretty cheap. Admission, membership, merchandise, and as much as we whinge about it even food and drink stack up pretty well to just about anywhere bar Augusta.
Without that massive influx of TV money, pressure goes on everything. We can demand a fan friendly fixture and have that game on Saturday afternoon, but is everyone happy if memberships and admissions have to wear a massive increase to cover the reduced value of the rights?
Geez, tough gig being the Grandpa. Buy the kid a pushy n tell him to pull the finger out 'coz you've got important retired Grandpa type stuff to do, like watching footy n having a quiet sip.
Reasonable point. But the broadcast revenue is linked to the quality of the product. A game with poor crowds in attendance affects the aesthetics and quality of the product. Don’t even get me started on the well documented other shortcomings of today’s game. Add all that into the mix, and broadcasters will ask for a better deal relative to the product they’re receiving in return.I know it's not a popular view but the AFL is correct to look after the TV rights because it subsidises everything else in the game.
When you look at it as a comparison with other sports and major events most things around AFL are pretty cheap. Admission, membership, merchandise, and as much as we whinge about it even food and drink stack up pretty well to just about anywhere bar Augusta.
Without that massive influx of TV money, pressure goes on everything. We can demand a fan friendly fixture and have that game on Saturday afternoon, but is everyone happy if memberships and admissions have to wear a massive increase to cover the reduced value of the rights?
And they need the extra cash to cover the 10 or so new "head Off" positions AFL house needs every yearI know it's not a popular view but the AFL is correct to look after the TV rights because it subsidises everything else in the game.
When you look at it as a comparison with other sports and major events most things around AFL are pretty cheap. Admission, membership, merchandise, and as much as we whinge about it even food and drink stack up pretty well to just about anywhere bar Augusta.
Without that massive influx of TV money, pressure goes on everything. We can demand a fan friendly fixture and have that game on Saturday afternoon, but is everyone happy if memberships and admissions have to wear a massive increase to cover the reduced value of the rights?