Sure comment away about a players performance, knock yours socks off. But you're not just commenting about his performance, you're acting like he needs to be sacked "He'd want to produce soon".
It's the arrogance of putting a player "under the microscope", like you're the authority to judge his ability. Like you have determined he needs some extra attention or performance management. Typically you've ignored the questions I've asked.
For the record:
We've won 1 game at VFL level when Brown has had under 20 possies (his first game back).
When he's had over 20, we're 3-1. When he's under 20, we're 1-2.
Yes they're "only stats" but generally stats are an indicator as to how well someone is performing (eg Grainger Barass got subbed with 0 K and HB yesterday).
They also would be a rough guide for how his contribution to the team contributes to our performances. Something I'm sure you're microscope would easily
pick up.
Opponent | D | M | T | Clr | Result |
Giants | 9 | 2 | 3 | 1 | W |
Werribee | 22 | 2 | 2 | 0 | L |
Sandringham | 30 | 5 | 3 | 1 | W |
Brisbane | 21 | 5 | 1 | 1 | W |
Sydney | 14 | 4 | 0 | 1 | L |
Southport | 26 | 5 | 0 | 2 | W |
Box Hill | 15 | 2 | 3 | 0 | L |
So what are you putting him under the microscope for? What does he need to do to start "producing" in your eyes?
If you want to say he lacks consistency. I'd agree. Those numbers are all over the shop. However, most young players in their 2nd years lack consistency.
Are you saying he's not producing because he's not defending well enough? Are you saying it because he didn't find much of the ball this week and 2 weeks before that? I'm guessing, but not sure, you're allowing a young player to actually develop and learn? You know, get feedback after a game and see how they respond?
I'm also guessing, given how damaging he is by foot, just maybe the opposition isn't giving him as much latitutde as he might have got in the earlier games?
Perhaps he's got to adjust to people playing him differently? Or is that now allowed in a 2nd year player?
What is the baseline acceptable criteria that a late teens pick is expected to achieve in your lordships opinion? Which players in his position also taken in his draft year do you think are the benchmark he should be aiming to get to?