Welcome to Tigers: Jason Castagna | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Welcome to Tigers: Jason Castagna

Leysy Days said:
Not many talented kids see the backline at all in juniors.

Many go there as seniors.

Think he's well suited and our 5 talented small forwards won't go into 3 roles up in attack.

Wing or backline is best suited for Shae compared to the others ILO.

Rioli also a chance of midfield in time.

Well, there really isn't much need for any other forwards when we have the ABSOLUTE KEY down there! Jack will probably have to play mid or back hereafter; no longer important for our structure. Just like Drioli and Shai.
 
Giardiasis said:
He’s just bitter that you didn’t mark Hampson as our ABSOLUTE KEY down there.

Who asked what you think, handsome? There's obviously only one ABSOLUTE KEY to our FL structure.
 
leon said:
Who asked what you think, handsome? There's obviously only one ABSOLUTE KEY to our FL structure.

There’s one key to bringing the mood down on any thread - Leon aka the deflator.

You should hire yourself out at parties - when you want the crowd to disperse call the deflator. Just go in and be yourself. Party over.
 
MD Jazz said:
There’s one key to bringing the mood down on any thread - Leon aka the deflator.

You should hire yourself out at parties - when you want the crowd to disperse call the deflator. Just go in and be yourself. Party over.

So true Hahahaha. Leonie is sitting on a gold mine.
 
BTW I know this is the George thread but in the last 4 years since Hammer has been with us we go at nearly 70% win ratio when he doesn't play and around 37% when he does.

In our last 5 years we've only had two extended bad form patches, first half of 2014 and all of 2016. There might be AN ABSOLUTE KEY as to why that was.
 
MD Jazz said:
There’s one key to bringing the mood down on any thread - Leon aka the deflator.

You should hire yourself out at parties - when you want the crowd to disperse call the deflator. Just go in and be yourself. Party over.

So I heard you are already on the payroll as Leysey's fluffer. A key to inflating his performance, right?

What are on Earth are you talking about? So you agree that Jason Castagna is (the) 'absolute key to the FL', right? So why don't you come out and support and expand on that rather than lapse into an attempt at puerile sarcasm?

I absolutely loved our fantastic success and attended all finals. There's no deflating from the euphoria on my part. I just happen to recognise that our champion team beat the Crows team of champions. The success of our FL was a team effort, just like across the whole field. Look at the wide range of goal-scorers; very hard to know where our next goal will come from for the opposition; not relying too much on any one forward.

Castagna is a work in progress with some really great attributes, and things he really needs to work on improving too. To say he is (the) 'absolute key' to the FL, after 20 games and compared to the contribution of Jack Riewoldts' 225 games including his GF performance, is what is truly inflating.

My euphoria doesn't extend to accepting such nonsense.
 
lamb22 said:
BTW I know this is the George thread but in the last 4 years since Hammer has been with us we go at nearly 70% win ratio when he doesn't play and around 37% when he does.

In our last 5 years we've only had two extended bad form patches, first half of 2014 and all of 2016. There might be AN ABSOLUTE KEY as to why that was.

My Gawd! Such a stuck record. Such a sad loser. So irrelevant! But still harping on about Hampson? That's all the credibility you (think) you have left, Chops? It's pretty sad what you have reduced yourself to, Chops.

Wrong about Sir Damian Hardwick! Wrong about the RFC! Wrong about the team and game-plan!

Ever heard of that old saying about statistics? Clearly not. But I tell you what, Chops. Out of compassion and sympathy for your plight (frequently mistaken), I am going to let you keep believing this.

So, yes, without a shadow of doubt, Hampson has been responsible for all RFC losses over the last 5 years - whether he was playing or not. (Now back to this thread).

In all sincerity, try to move on, Chops.
 
leon said:
So I heard you are already on the payroll as Leysey's fluffer. A key to inflating his performance, right?

What are on Earth are you talking about? So you agree that Jason Castagna is (the) 'absolute key to the FL', right? So why don't you come out and support and expand on that rather than lapse into an attempt at puerile sarcasm?

I absolutely loved our fantastic success and attended all finals. There's no deflating from the euphoria on my part. I just happen to recognise that our champion team beat the Crows team of champions. The success of our FL was a team effort, just like across the whole field. Look at the wide range of goal-scorers; very hard to know where our next goal will come from for the opposition; not relying too much on any one forward.

Castagna is a work in progress with some really great attributes, and things he really needs to work on improving too. To say he is (the) 'absolute key' to the FL, after 20 games and compared to the contribution of Jack Riewoldts' 225 games including his GF performance, is what is truly inflating.

My euphoria doesn't extend to accepting such nonsense.

Comprehension not strong again.

Never said "The".

Also never compared to Jack. Who is also key to our forward line. Moreso. Obviously.
 
Chestnuts needs some kicking lessons at PRO....the old way. Keep drilling 100 kicks at goal until he gets it right no matter how late or dark it gets at PRO.
 
I am getting fed up with your feeble attempts to insult my comprehension, Hazy. This is from a poster who often resorts to replies like the following when I challenge his loose thinking. This was your first reply to my response to your George post:

"No idea what your post means Leonie." So who struggles to comprehend? To a straightforward reply? Or often tries to cop out in this way?

Now here are the key words from your original post:

"Love George, absolute key to our forward structure."

The sentence doesn't need to include 'the' because it is implied by the context. It's unnecessary because you included the word 'absolute'. Now, do you comprehend the word 'absolute'? For the same reason, Jack is excluded because Jason is "absolute". Regardless of whether you mentioned him or not.

Comprende? It's understandable for posters to wax lyrical over the performance of our players winning the flag, but that statement is over the top IMHO.
 
leon said:
"Love George, absolute key to our forward structure."

The sentence doesn't need to include 'the' because it is implied by the context.

Don't you mean to say "sentence doesn't need to include 'the' because it is implied by context."
 
leon said:
I am getting fed up with your feeble attempts to insult my comprehension, Hazy. This is from a poster who often resorts to replies like the following when I challenge his loose thinking. This was your first reply to my response to your George post:

"No idea what your post means Leonie." So who struggles to comprehend? To a straightforward reply? Or often tries to cop out in this way?

Now here are the key words from your original post:

"Love George, absolute key to our forward structure."

The sentence doesn't need to include 'the' because it is implied by the context. It's unnecessary because you included the word 'absolute'. Now, do you comprehend the word 'absolute'? For the same reason, Jack is excluded because Jason is "absolute". Regardless of whether you mentioned him or not.

Comprende? It's understandable for posters to wax lyrical over the performance of our players winning the flag, but that statement is over the top IMHO.

"The" is not implied.

"An" was the implied word from leysy.

George is AN absolute key to the forward line. Like say a Jack or Daniel.

Anyway enough of getting dragged into your pettiness.

123kid said:
Don't you mean to say "sentence doesn't need to include 'the' because it is implied by context."

Bahaha - Game Set Match from the Kid.
 
Been amazing this year how one of the 3 amigos tends to play really well each game. Its almost like they have a roster.
 
Leysy Days said:
"The" is not implied.

"An" was the implied word from leysy.

George is AN absolute key to the forward line. Like say a Jack or Daniel.

Anyway enough of getting dragged into your pettiness.

Bahaha - Game Set Match from the Kid.

So that's a complete back-down. You never used either word. Absolute means 'total.' It's not petty to question really silly over-statements.

Another loss of Game Set Match by HazyDazy, and doubt you even comprehend the Kid.