100% the AFL wouldve been on the phone telling them 'If you don't bend them over don't come back asking for more cash'The Corrupt AFL will be pulling the strings in the background, trying to bend the Tigers over and get as much as possible.
Come on now, graham is quick when he is on the receiving end of a good shove from Hawkins to get him going.Agree, imagine getting both Mitchell and Crouch and adding them to Prestia and Graham in a 4 X 100M relay leg, they wouldn't medal at the Senior Olympics!!
I've been thinking it will be something like 12, 19, F1 and 30 for Taranto, Hopper, 39, 57 and 59.
Firstly, Historically, the 'dreamed up numbers' tend to be close to the mark and represent negotiating positions. It may be that the rumours are true, or it may be its a self-fulfilling prophecy, but either way, it tends to be on the mark, unless Dudoro is involved.Impossible to know what is coming out of GWS, or from player managers,- or is being simply dreamed up by those members of our poorest quality media.
But if GWS keep upping the price, as is now being reported, clearly we can’t satisfy them.
Impossible to know what is coming out of GWS, or from player managers,- or is being simply dreamed up by those members of our poorest quality media.
But if GWS keep upping the price, as is now being reported, clearly we can’t satisfy them.
I previously suggested transferring a paid up player, Ivan, as another way of passing over value to GWS, this while keeping our future 1st.
The move was to be supported by the trade of Fridge to Adelaide, (Best case Fridge and future 2nd to Adelaide for their future 1st, with salary saved used to help meet the cost of paying Ivan’s salary at GWS).
Posh, going back to Taranto # 1662, you proposed including both George and Soldo in such an exchange. I assume you meant that we would have to pay both their salaries as well.
We need to keep one of our better picks, imo our future first, but if we are to keep any it might cost us both George and Ivan. Hard to see though how we can afford afford to pay for both.
If there is a way to keep a 1st round pick for next year I'd love to do it, but I just don't see it.
In terms of George and Soldo, we would have already done the sums of those 2 being in our cap for next year alongside Taranto and Hopper, so if we were to trade both as part of the Taranto / Hopper trade, then if we pay for some, I assume we will pay over and above the value of a new draftee so it would be net sum to us.
The only way to get sufficient savings in is to trade a player to a 3rd party. I think Fridge to Adelaide may be a possibility but that saving would leave us with enough to pay for only one player to send to GWS, not two.If there is a way to keep a 1st round pick for next year I'd love to do it, but I just don't see it.
In terms of George and Soldo, we would have already done the sums of those 2 being in our cap for next year alongside Taranto and Hopper, so if we were to trade both as part of the Taranto / Hopper trade, then if we pay for some, I assume we will pay over and above the value of a new draftee so it would be net sum to us.
both the boys are top 5 draft picks and have been prime movers in a successful side , it would take a lot of pics before we got this kinda quality ready to impact in the middle , they are at young enough age that we should get 5+ years of very good service ,,,get it doneI think Bully is well within his rights to question the deal. We're getting good players but it does come at a hefty price.
All trades are a gamble & so are untried draft picks.
Time will tell ultimately how it works out. Fingers crossed these lads contribute largely towards 5 or 6 years of sustained success.
The only way to get sufficient savings in is to trade a player to a 3rd party. I think Fridge to Adelaide may be a possibility but that saving would leave us with enough to pay for only one player to send to GWS, not two.
The offer to GWS would be
Soldo with his full wage paid until the end of his current contract and picks 12, 19 and 30 for Hopper, Taranto and picks 39 and 57.
both the boys are top 5 draft picks and have been prime movers in a successful side , it would take a lot of pics before we got this kinda quality ready to impact in the middle , they are at young enough age that we should get 5+ years of very good service ,,,get it done
Yea 7 years in and coming off a decent layoff due to injury , if prestia was no6 only , cerra also top 10 pic only , I’m not sure there’s a case for 2 x r1 ,,,Dylan shiel was a few years younger fwiwOnly slight variation but Hopper was drafted at Pick 7. They will argue they want the same value for him, l we will argue that he is 7 years into his career and have him therefore discounted somewhat. I think we end up agreeing that he is worth 10-15 and we would struggle to find someone in that pick range who could impact the way he can immediately, so totally agree with you, we'll get it done.
Hopper may end up being the 1st to get done. Pick 19 plus 30 for Hopper and Pick 39.
Yea 7 years in and coming off a decent layoff due to injury , if prestia was no6 only , cerra also top 10 pic only , I’m not sure there’s a case for 2 x r1 ,,,Dylan shiel was a few years younger fwiw
The anger I feel with the biast sheet wankley says, is like the old style whistling kettles, whenever I hear him talk like this, I say rather a bit loud ,GET *smile*,which in my business last week,a elderly customer said I beg your pardon,I replied, do u really want me to repeat what I said luckily she broke out a smile.The only thing that flawed Pinoccio was we always back door Geelong View attachment 16765