casper68 said:S.E.N footy ratings Dan got a 5 out 10.
One report didn't have Rance in our best 7Baloo said:I think most people who saw the match, not just RFC supporters, will laugh at that
casper68 said:S.E.N footy ratings Dan got a 5 out 10.
casper68 said:S.E.N footy ratings Dan got a 5 out 10.
Which was probably right.mjb said:Neither coach could fit him in their top 5
Old Leo Schlink must have been drunk. He couldn't find a vote for Cotchin.LeeToRainesToRoach said:Got a vote in the HS. As in best three on the ground. Maybe the journo was in the bar and went off the stats.
LeeToRainesToRoach said:Got a vote in the HS. As in best three on the ground. Maybe the journo was in the bar and went off the stats.
Just saw Murphy's goal that everyone's raving about. Gets handball receive, snaps goal. The end. Nice goal but they're kidding if they reckon it's on a par with Rioli's.
LeeToRainesToRoach said:Got a vote in the HS. As in best three on the ground. Maybe the journo was in the bar and went off the stats.
Harry said:Not sure how murphys goal can possibly be better. Rioli beat his taller opponent in the air, kept the ball in, changed direction and wrong footed his opponent while uo against the boundary line, gave it off got it back and banana'd it from 40 out on the boundary.
antman said:It's like the "best" players list - more possessions = better, less = worse. The journos just read the player stats and judge accordingly.
mrposhman said:The things I really loved about Dans game (other than the goals obviously) were also those things that you don't get a stat for. The little taps when going up in contests to keep the ball in play. Really smart player, will just keep getting better.