So where do you value Noble from Collingwood?very generous
So where do you value Noble from Collingwood?very generous
Late 20sSo where do you value Noble from Collingwood?
GCS give 6 + 12, we give back 39.
So it is effectively 6 + 23 which is equivalent to pick 2 (2,573 pts) which in my mind is probably about right.
It’s overs, but it's a seller's market.
No pay - no deal.
Simples.
Pick 6 is generous for Rioli. However, he is contracted. so Gold Coast have to pay up.
Rioli & 39 & 41
for Gold Coasts picks - 6 & 13
Our list won't be worth 95% next year. May as well pay some of his salary for more coming back our way.Why pay any of his salary , they want him , they pay him he us contracted, they want him the pay the pick we want he IS contracted
Our list won't be worth 95% next year. May as well pay some of his salary for more coming back our way.
Or redo contracts to front load?We are shedding millions off the list aren’t we.
I have no idea the exact amounts but it would be something like
Shai $1,000,000
Rioli $750,000
Baker $700,000
Graham $600,000
Dusty $1,200,000
Grimes $500,000
Prestia takes a pay cut too.
Lynch from memory was backended, might go up $500,000
Taranto and Hopper salary probably rises too. Again no idea how much, let’s say $600,000 combined.
There will be other rises for sure, but it will still leave us paying well short of the required 95% of the salary cap.
It’s good business to pay part of the salary of one or two departing players if it means improving our draft hand.
I sit somewhere in between. 6 plus something extra sounds about right to me. If that ends up being pick 20ish that'd be fine by me.
Love it when someone who doesn’t have to do the deal sets the benchmark for failure for someone who actually has to do itIf Blair can't get 6 and 12 for Rioli, then he's failed.
Which ones? Doesn’t make sense.Or redo contracts to front load?
Which ones? Doesn’t make sense.
Snowballs the problem down the road and makes it worse IMO. (Overpaying for the talent we will have in a couple of years time)Why doesn’t it make sense?
Snowballs the problem down the road and makes it worse IMO. (Overpaying for the talent we will have in a couple of years time)
There's not a lot there but Tarranto Hopper Short and everyone we sign/resign. I was talking more philosophically. I'm all for paying some of Bolton and Rioli if we can get a better draft hand.Which ones? Doesn’t make sense.
i agree Dan has done his bit for Richmond, we can capitalise on his stock value now.Love it when someone who doesn’t have to do the deal sets the benchmark for failure for someone who actually has to do it
I love Dan Rioli but if we get 6 and 20 that’s a great deal imo.
In addition, with the influx of high-quality youth that is about to walk through the door, and help us to forget Season 2024, we will need to be issuing quite a few pay rises in the coming years, so need to have space to do so and keep the players (and, apparently, their girlfriends) happy at Punt Rd.It's the opposite. It actually stops the problem from snowballing down the road.
i.e. If we front end Hoppers contract, in 3-4 years time it will be worth little per year so gives flexibility to pay him out, trade him, keep him etc without it being a noose around our neck. Which it currently looks like it will be.