17pTigers of Old said:What did we think about Dan's opening game?
Was ok but personally thought he was a lot less dynamic than I expected.
Seemed a step slower & had trouble handling the footy cleanly (perhaps due to the humidity).
Not so much of his customary pressure either.
Hopefully just getting the cobwebs out cause we need him to play better vs the Pies.
BillyJean17 said:17p
4 i50
2 goal assist
9 score involvements
2 tackles
Pretty ok game , if he can build on this I’d be delighted
Need the 3 amigos to re-unite!turk-d-tiger said:Going to sound strange but just felt like he always got that bad bounce and never got the run of the green so to speak
just didnt happen for him last thursday night
zippadeee said:Had the Crosby’s on. If he had real boots on he would’ve been alight.
He tried his usually magic but slipped over too many times
Dont Argue said:Did you hear that the AFL have actually banned the use of long stops! True story. Was reported by commentators during one of the games on the weekend.
The mind boggles.
Dont Argue said:Did you hear that the AFL have actually banned the use of long stops! True story. Was reported by commentators during one of the games on the weekend.
The mind boggles.
zippadeee said:Gary Lyon said it, and Paul Roos didn’t believe him. During the Port/Melb game.
I couldn’t believe it
Mr Brightside said:The Shep game looked like he was in for a huge year, the last 2 games he just looks a tad switched off to me, as bigger fan as I am for him to go onto a wing, playing deep at Lynch’s feet maybe a good option at this point.
22nd Man said:Further away from goal the less Ilike him. Midfielders picking up kicks defensive side of centre are dime a dozen.. Don't need Dan doing that.
zippadeee said:Had the Crosby’s on. If he had real boots on he would’ve been alight.
He tried his usually magic but slipped over too many times
Dont Argue said:Did you hear that the AFL have actually banned the use of long stops! True story. Was reported by commentators during one of the games on the weekend.
The mind boggles.
Dyer'ere said:I can see your point, 22nd. But the thing about Dan is he doesn't get quite as much ball as we might have hoped. And one of the standard moves to get a player more involved is to play hime behind the ball. There have been a thousand failures of the plan but Jason Akermanis is the success story we remember.
It almost certainly won't happen this year but it's a fringe view with classical bases. It's one I share with a few other PRE lunatics.
Is Jayden Short a good kick? Daniel Rioli is. And thta's without the luxury of laying the ball of with a minute to spare. And there has never been a small forward Daniel Rioli couldn't catch. And even hurt.
Then there's the wear and tear. Small backs get it a lot easier than small forwards do. Daniel had any injuries? Totally due to playing forward in that case.
It is a great luxury in any time, and even more so in this time of eighteen teams and diluted talent pools, to have a glamour like Daniel Rioli running off your backline. Hey - Alex Rance is far too classy for the backline.
If we try Rioli in the backline I will be very happy.
Further to all of this. I think many if us think Daniel Rioli has another gear. And some believe that he'll find it behind the ball. And maybe we see backline lessons as a an accelerant here. A miracle cure. When maybe evolution is the right way forward. Revolution, for me, with Dinsdale Rioli.