It’s not disingenuous at all.
I realise what role he was employed to do. I was replying to the post that stated he was responsible for building a multi premiership list.
Which he wasn’t. I stated and acknowledged his contribution along with others.
Of course there were failures, no master drafter, recruiter or trade guru gets them all right
What I did refer to was Blair being the List Manager but since our last premiership 4 years ago we have gone backwards. We weren’t picking at the back end of the draft since then.
I doubt anyone would disagree with that fact. Between he and Matt Clarke what success stories have we had. Taranto, I’d give a tick. Hopper, in s(supporter) hindsight , a no. They’re highly paid to make those decisions . What else in 4 years?
Now back to the original post that brought us here.
We had nearly all the currency in our back end of picks to give Brisbane a still very generous return for their pick 20 and we kept pick 32.
That was the crux of it. Unless Blair has something else up his sleeve, which I acknowledged might be the case, and which I’m waiting to see. If he doesn’t, we got reamed.
Purely my opinion. Others differ.
I didn't say you were being disingenuous, settle down.
You say go back 4 years.
2020 draft, we had pick 20 and 26. Last in first round. It was a thin draft, we traded and Geelong got Holmes (as zips points out 2-3 times a week). Our draft intel was clearly wrong though with him. Not a lot of success stories thereafter though. Traded into 2021. Right strategy, I'd say. Execution of 21 draft needed.
2021: yep, bunch of picks inside 30. We all know the deal there. Right list strategy, bringing in 5 young ones in a deepish draft.
2022/23: these picks Elijah Hewitt and Max Gruzewski for Taranto (big tick)
Toby McMullin and Daniel Curtin for Hopper. We might have taken Caddy if we'd kept it rather than Curtin, but who knows, we can't be sure! At this stage, Hopper is in front of those players, even though he's been disappointing with us. The Hopper deal, long term, not looking good. But if you only look at the two players taken at those picks - strategy looks OK. On a risk basis, it was probably the right call. We wouldn't have expected all the injuries and the coach to bail.
Questionable is the clubs strategy to try eek out one more Premiership. You can see the reasons why we'd have tried, especially after the final in Brisbane. Injuries have made that strategy fail miserably. On paper though, we're better than our performance.
Blair doesn't set the club strategy. He plays his part in building towards it as you'd know, but if you've got a three time premiership coach saying "we go again, these guys are still responding to me" you don't undermine him and say "nah, we'll go to the draft." If you do that, might as well sack him. A club that doesn't support their coaches vision will surely implode.
So, is Blair horrible? No. The strategy - which the whole club needs to wear, including our ex-jump-the-sinking-ship-coach has backfired. I think in terms of what we'd be asking him to do, he gets a pass, but nowhere near an A grade.
Tim Livingstone on the other hand....he'd want to get our High Performance manager right, and hope to god Yze lifts. I'd have him as a fail since 2021, and he should be looking over his shoulders if we perform below expectations this year.