Yeah, Conca and Stengle left, not sure we fought too hard for either. Actually Chol too.You forgot the Concanater ….
Over the same period we have lost Victorians Lids, BEllis, Butler, Higgins, Dusty and CCJ to other clubs.
-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Trade Week - Richmond Only
- Thread starter Smoking Aces
- Start date
Over the same period we have lost Victorians Lids, BEllis, Butler, Higgins, Dusty and CCJ to other clubs.
Spot on Posh Spice.
The evenness, thus different rankings clubs have is a big reason we can potentially snaffle some great trades into 25 for our later picks.
If we are getting pick 2 we need to keep pick 6. I am ok with trading pick 10 or 11. But not 6. It’s at the sweet spot of the draft.
Maybe we can use 6 to get 2 and get st kilda’s 7 by splitting it smoking?
If the reputed deal with north inclusive of their F1 is true then the need to trade into 2025 is alleviated by getting another F1.
7 is as good as 6 to us because if north have it we know who they are going to pick.
6,10,11 and say 20 for 2,7 and north’s F1
That works Sin. Just need to make sure we have 3 picks in the top 10.
Thats exactly what we need to do IMO.
6 and 11 for 2 and Norths F1
10 and 20 for Saints 7.
Go to the draft with 1,2,7,18,23 and 24. We can either slide with the later ones, or take those picks there.
3 top 10 picks this year. 2 more next year.
Take 6 in the ND, 1 in the RD and leave 1 spot to test players out in the SSP.
Rhymes nicely - should be a chant for every time he stuffs up, the footy equivalent of "He's from Barcelona" if you will.
Stengle was on minimum rookie money maybe around 100,000 if lucky Adelaide offered just over 300,000 x 3 years,he was a certainty to make the grade but tigers had a full tight cap,so couldn't compete
Since the draft is one massive compromise anyway (which is ridiculous) - to roll with this theme it would be great to have first access to VFL players that a club has developed. Frustrates me when we have a good one but will likely lose because they just go into the draft pool.
For mine the lessons learned from first round picks is that they MUST HAVE AT LEAST 1 IF NOT 2 AFL STANDARD WEAPONS.
Sonsie, Ellis,Ward,Meyer,Jyhe Clarke etc have no afl weapons which means good vfl,but nothing at afl level.
All vanilla.
Sonsie, Ellis,Ward,Meyer,Jyhe Clarke etc have no afl weapons which means good vfl,but nothing at afl level.
All vanilla.
This may do it
Rich give Pick 10 for Port 13+29
Saints give Pick 7 for 11+20
Nth give Pick 2 for 7+18
Saints end up with 8+11+20
Nth 7+18
Rich with 1+2+6+13+23+24+29, give 10+11+18+20 for 2+13+29
Rich give Pick 10 for Port 13+29
Saints give Pick 7 for 11+20
Nth give Pick 2 for 7+18
Saints end up with 8+11+20
Nth 7+18
Rich with 1+2+6+13+23+24+29, give 10+11+18+20 for 2+13+29
I posted a variation of this last week to include the rumoured North offer of including their F1
Rich give Pick 10 for Port 13+29
Saints give Pick 7 for 13+20 (may take18)
Nth give Pick 2 and F1 for 6 and 11
Richmond with 1+2+7+18+23+24+29+North F1 give 6,10,11,20 for 2,7,29 and North F1
Saints with 8+13+20
North with 6+11 ( lose their F1)
But you could swap 6 and 7 in there , makes no difference probably
Can’t see the saints doing that Sting for the same reason we don’t want to trade out #6. Picks #7 and #8 together is really powerful, just like having #10 and #11 together in terms of getting the right mix of players.
Has there been any discussion of trading our #1 for Melbs #5 and #9, which for us would only work if we traded in #2 for say #10 and #11.
1, 6, 10 and 11 become
2, 5, 6 and 9.
If we can’t get 3 picks within the first 6, then I reckon we stay put. The cost of having #1 and #2 is too much compared to staying put with #1 and #6 and keeping our later picks.
The Saints have alreacy indicated that they would be willing to trade back as they'd like more picks in this draft.
We should be aiming to get 7 from the saints first then do the deal with the Roos for 6 or 7 plus a cherry on top, for pick 2.
Has to be 7 from the saints though, can't do 8.
Has to be 7 from the saints though, can't do 8.
Agree, and maybe thinking about it, maybe thats why we might do the deal with Port too.
Do 10 for 13 and 29
Then do 6, 13 and 29 to North for 2 and F1. I reckon 2 and F1 is heaviliy in our favour, giving them back a 2nd this year will balance it out. North split their pick 2 into 3 picks in this years draft, with the age of their list, next years draft is relatively meaningless, they need to go now.
Then do 11 and 18 to the Saints for 7.
If we think of it like this
2>>>>>6
F1>>>>10
7>>>>>11
We give up Pick 18 as currency to do all the above.
We should be over the moon to do that and I'm not sure why any Tigers don't think we should. They are good deals that suit all 4 clubs objectives.
