Leysy Days said:Gai says all her horses are going to win as well. Do we always believe her?
Even Nash admitted he gave More Joyous a tough run. Does leysy think he cost her the race, perhaps not with the 60kgs. but she had none once he worked her like that.
As for Pierro, he boots him up the hill 4 & 5 wide after missing the kick on a pace 11 lengths quicker than normal. That is why a 1/5 pop was burnt at the end. Wasnt the horses fault it got run down..
They were poor rides. Fact.
Cant see why its so hard to admit that, every jockey thats ever ridden has had them. & Nash had his yesterday.
spook said:Yeah, stinkin ride from Nash. Only way Pierro was going to lose. Had him all-up into Solzy, Buffering and Snitzerland. :veryupset
Leysy Days said:Gai says all her horses are going to win as well. Do we always believe her?
Leysy Days said:Cant see why its so hard to admit that, every jockey thats ever ridden has had them. & Nash had his yesterday.
Leysy Days said:Thats Gai, she has never bagged a hoop, least not publically. He's a good jock, especially when he can rate them in front, but Nash cooked them yesterday. Not talking through leysy's pocket either as he backed the winner of the Toorak.
Here's why -
THEY say Gai Waterhouse never has time to cook and that's a good thing for Nash Rawiller.
Rawiller deserved an almighty bake for his back-to-back butchering of Gai's two champions at Caulfield yesterday.
It was almost as if the rider was now so immersed in Sydney and Gai's way of doing things - ie.foot to the floor, no sitting back - he forgot about the tricky nuances of Caulfield.
There is a hill near the 1400m mark at Caulfield so steep only sherpas should be allowed to climb it.
There has been a rule at The Heath for 100 years. If you work hard up the hill, even if your name is Kingston Town or Tenzing Norgay, you will struggle to make the summit.
Rawiller knows this.
In a previous life, Rawiller used to ride here. He even won a Caulfield Cup a few years back on Elvstroem.
But there he was in yesterday's Toorak Handicap, charging up the hill on More Joyous, whose 60kg impost became akin to Norgay lurching up Everest with Hillary's bags, and Hillary, on his back.
Rawiller eventually found a spot outside the leader but by the home turn the little mare was gasping and a goner.
In a post race interview, Rawiller all-but 'fessed up.
Pressman: "Nash, you said she needed a tough run before the Cox Plate ... "
Rawiller (with that embarrassed half-smile of a kid caught doing something naughty): "How do I put this? Well, I certainly gave her a tough run."
Waterhouse, who doesn't cook, at least not in public, smiled happily as an ashen Rawiller returned to scale.
"There's no point being glum. We've had a really nice day at the races and there's more to come," she said, beaming.
In a way she was right. There was more butchering to come. Rawiller, pre-programmed to go forward according to Waterhouse Rule 1A) - is there even a 1B)? - was posted on a limb from a wide gate for the first 200m then, as that deadly hill loomed, pressed forward to climb it on Pierro.
Sherpas and mountain goats went sprawling as Pierro climbed and climbed.
Course and RSN racecaller Greg Miles has called thousands of horses up the Caulfield hill over the decades. Rarely has Miles seen one climb and win.
"We'll see how good he is now," Miles said.
Later, form analyst Daniel O'Sullivan would tweet that the first 1000 metres in the Guineas, including that charge up the hill, was "11 lengths quicker than normal".
Again post-race, Waterhouse beamed as Rawiller sought to disappear into the earth.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/superracing/stars-left-gasping-on-trail-of-sherpas/story-fn67siys-1226495041300
Leysy Days said:Gai says all her horses are going to win as well. Do we always believe her?
Even Nash admitted he gave More Joyous a tough run.
lukeanddad said:Given recent news reports into this industry, one wonders if the jockey just had a bad day or whether other factors were at play...
lukeanddad said:Excellent analysis. Very sloppy rides, both of them.
Given recent news reports into this industry, one wonders if the jockey just had a bad day or whether other factors were at play...
Greed for that extra 20%.Streak said:Ouch.
Never put something in the red into an all-up.
I'd like to say it is one of my golden rules, but I still do it mind you. But is amazing how many times I have come unstuck chasing a few extra dollars.
SCOOP said:You'd hope it was just a couple of stinking rides and not the other darker factors.
rosy23 said:That's a similar situation to Luke Nolan being down on himself for his ride on Black Caviar at Royal Ascot and Peter Moody's scathing comments when he virtually told Luke's critics they wouldn't have a clue. Luke copped a fair pasting on PRE at the time too.
jb03 said:Nolen's ride on BC was a dead set shocker despite what Moody said post race. Nolen admitted as much post race before the PR and spin took over.
rosy23 said:What do you refer to by "darker" factors? It's very ordinary to even allude to Nash, or any other jockey or connection, being involved with anything untoward if there's no basis to it.
lukeanddad said:Excellent analysis. Very sloppy rides, both of them.
Given recent news reports into this industry, one wonders if the jockey just had a bad day or whether other factors were at play...
rosy23 said:Ok so Gai is a liar and now Peter is a liar? Funny how people on the internet know more than those actually involved.
I bet Luke's still down on himself if he thinks about it. Jockeys hardly jump off and high five everyone when a good horse doesn't have results as expected. Black Caviar was injured, she was tired, she'd travelled the world, she'd been shunted from here to eternity and back distance wise. Luke stopped pushing her as he'd usually do and she slowed down. Not her usual manner of racing. I wonder why she's had such an extended spell if it was the jockey's fault? Maybe he shouldn't have laid off but nobody questioned that at other times and he wasn't to know she was stuffed. Even Leysy said had Luke ridden a perfect race on her she'd only win by half a length maximum more. Which of you is correct about the ride? Was it a "dead set shocker" or did it just lessen the margin a smidgeon?
SCOOP said:It was mentioned by LukeandDad beforfe my post but I am not shocked that I was singled out.
rosy23 said:Your post clearly alluded to something improper. It's very ordinary to question the integrity of another person/people if there's no substance whatsoever behind it.
SCOOP said:The question is very valid considering the article.
rosy23 said:There's no indication in that article that the result was influenced by the alleged bet.