Re: To win or not to win - Draft pics V late season wins
Harry said:
don't look at geelong, they've always had a good core group of senior players that knew how to win games which helped develop the kids coming through. At tigerland the senior players could only hand down how to lose and go into their shells while doing so. That's why we need a massive cull to clean out the rotten culture and we need a massive influx of talented kids, coz a softly softly approach aint gonna help this club.
yep ludicrous comparing us to geelong or any other successful team for that matter.
geelong had a fantastic core to work from. 3 gfs from 92 to 95. continued to play finals in 96 and 97 they finished second on the ladder in 97.
they then had a slight down period in 98 and 99. finishing 12th and 11th. they had young players in scarlett milburn king street wojcinski harley mooney with a core of senior players from the 92 to 97 period. it was really 98 thru trades and the 99 nd that made up a huge part of their resurgence at the end of 03 and in 2004.
the 99 draft snared them corey chapman ling enright and they traded for mooney.
2000 they made finals on the back of most of those core players still they got bundled out in an elimination final.they thought they werent to far away in 2000 and at the end of that yr traded heavily for kingsley murphy and white they soon realised the futility of this in 2001. the only player they got from 2000 whos still there was hunt.
2001 bought another low finish 12th they knew it was a good draft and they also realised it was time for a final cleanout. it was a perfect time to finish bottom half dozen. the 2001 draft snared them bartel kelly gairdner playfair steve and david johnson. add the 99 draft to this draft and you have their core from the 2007 premiership.
in a way they built their premiership on lower finishes they may not have bottomed out because of the core players they have had since the 80s. yep they have in the main been decent since 1989. every time they have had a low finish they have in the main made it count at draft time. sheesh even in 06 10th place after two finals appearances and they clean up with selwood. that 10th place got them the missing piece in their premiership puzzle.
the interesting thing on this mob is since 01 they have not had the need to use more than 4 nd picks each draft because the players and depth was there. the reverse for them has happened they have been forced to offload players they probably wanted to keep.
the latest pick they have used since 01 is pick 62 on mathew egan. and 61 on stokes.
theres very few who made a contribution to their premiership after the 01 draft. maybe 3 or 4 their side in the main was built on the back of low finishes. and no they didnt bottom out they have never had that need.