-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Tambling (merged)
- Thread starter nut
- Start date
Re: Tambling [Merged]
Depends entirely on the reasons behind his poor form this year IMO. Was it because he was uncomfortable with his role within the team or was it more to do with his interrupted preseason, calf surgery and hip problems? If it's the latter then I can't see any reason to not expect him to return to 2009 form if his operations went well enough to allow him a full preseason. If it's the former then another ordinary year is certainly a distinct possibility although you'd think a return to the backline (mooted as you say) would suit him far more than the half forward role he mostly played this year.
Given the reported interest of at least 3 teams, I think it's reasonable to assume they saw his good form under Rawlings in 09 and believe he can return to that if he's fit and played in a similar role. I wonder - if that's the case - what the Saints, Dogs and Lions see in him that Richmond don't given our need for attacking mids.
Leysy Days said:
Depends entirely on the reasons behind his poor form this year IMO. Was it because he was uncomfortable with his role within the team or was it more to do with his interrupted preseason, calf surgery and hip problems? If it's the latter then I can't see any reason to not expect him to return to 2009 form if his operations went well enough to allow him a full preseason. If it's the former then another ordinary year is certainly a distinct possibility although you'd think a return to the backline (mooted as you say) would suit him far more than the half forward role he mostly played this year.
Leysy Days said:
Given the reported interest of at least 3 teams, I think it's reasonable to assume they saw his good form under Rawlings in 09 and believe he can return to that if he's fit and played in a similar role. I wonder - if that's the case - what the Saints, Dogs and Lions see in him that Richmond don't given our need for attacking mids.
Re: Tambling [Merged]
Not uncommon that they might have a different view of Tambling, whether that is ability wise or related to a role they may see for him.
If there was only one consensus there wouldn't be any trades ever made.
With Tambling, our coaching staff should be in a position to judge his potential to be a long termer for us very well & thus make a well judged call whether he is worth getting something in for. Other teams showing interest is a bonus if we have a coaching staff/list management team making intelligent & confident decisions.
Disco08 said:
Not uncommon that they might have a different view of Tambling, whether that is ability wise or related to a role they may see for him.
If there was only one consensus there wouldn't be any trades ever made.
With Tambling, our coaching staff should be in a position to judge his potential to be a long termer for us very well & thus make a well judged call whether he is worth getting something in for. Other teams showing interest is a bonus if we have a coaching staff/list management team making intelligent & confident decisions.
B
Bill James
Guest
Re: Tambling [Merged]
The Tambling of 2009 is worth having, the Tambling of 2010 is not. Depends a lot on how badly he was impacted this year by injury. My best for both parties if a good trade comes up.
The Tambling of 2009 is worth having, the Tambling of 2010 is not. Depends a lot on how badly he was impacted this year by injury. My best for both parties if a good trade comes up.
Re: Tambling [Merged]
And that is something that Richmond have got to get over. It's pointless hanging onto a player just because they may succeed elsewhere. If the trade is right it could be a win win for both the RFC and Richard Tambling. Tambling gets to play some decent football somewhere else that suits him better and the Tigers get a good pick and an equally good player with it.LidsBling&Cotch said:
Re: Tambling [Merged]
my money is its about the dollars
Tambling signs a cut price two year deal
other clubs know he will be at a discount coming of injury, and start making inquiries
inquires indicate he will get more elsewhere, suddenly a "fresh start" seems the go
just speculation, but if in doubt I usually bet on the dollars
my money is its about the dollars
Tambling signs a cut price two year deal
other clubs know he will be at a discount coming of injury, and start making inquiries
inquires indicate he will get more elsewhere, suddenly a "fresh start" seems the go
just speculation, but if in doubt I usually bet on the dollars
Re: Tambling [Merged]
The new club can negotiate a new contract if it wishes by giving an extension etc.
Allegedly that is what we're doing with Sherman. Offering him a 1 year extension, on top of the 2 left on his existing contract.
People are looking into this way too much for a conspiracy. It's pretty cut and dried.
The new club can negotiate a new contract if it wishes by giving an extension etc.
Allegedly that is what we're doing with Sherman. Offering him a 1 year extension, on top of the 2 left on his existing contract.
People are looking into this way too much for a conspiracy. It's pretty cut and dried.
Re: Tambling [Merged]
Yes because he has to agree to any trade and terms with the new club and that would include the dollar amount.
Disco08 said:
Yes because he has to agree to any trade and terms with the new club and that would include the dollar amount.
