Re: Tambling [Merged]
Yep.
I'm sure one day they'll have an opponent factor or something similar. If you can see it you can account for it after all.
Right now though I don't think those things are taken into account. That doesn't change the fact that these ratings are generally very accurate as I said.
Fair enough. I guess only time will tell if the string of great games he played as an attacking mid last year were flukes or not.
I didn't get to watch as much this year as I usually do but I honestly don't remember us playing the LMID all that often.
Leysy Days said:Does the B & F voting clearly suggest that does it?
Yep.
Leysy Days said:How do Pro-stats judge how well a player nullifies his opponent? Also how to they take into account the quality of the opponent they play on?
Getting tagged by Cameron Ling, or tagging Gary Ablett or Luke Hodge is decidely harder than getting Simon Hogan or Rick Ladson at those respective clubs. How much pro-stats take that into account?
I'm sure one day they'll have an opponent factor or something similar. If you can see it you can account for it after all.
Right now though I don't think those things are taken into account. That doesn't change the fact that these ratings are generally very accurate as I said.
Leysy Days said:If you looked at our setup throughout the year it is normally a 7 man defence actually.
You also cannot bank on your starting players getting 22 games a year. There will be plenty of opportunity for others to press there claims in the back half throughout next season.
& Dont forget Connors is only one indiscretion away from getting the arse & still has plenty to do to round out his game to be a lock.
Fair enough. I guess only time will tell if the string of great games he played as an attacking mid last year were flukes or not.
I didn't get to watch as much this year as I usually do but I honestly don't remember us playing the LMID all that often.