Re: Tambling [Merged]
Provided nothing? He played essentially the same position Nahas, King and Nason did for parts of the year and averaged the same amount of touches as they did and had more effective tackles and 1%ers than any of them. I know he was ordinary but lets not exaggerate too much.
According to KFCTiger they knew about his problems for a couple of months. Why they played him instead of getting the surgery immediately I don't know.
His 2009 season was very good as a whole. You don't have to play 22 great games to call it a good season Jimmy. His 2008 was also pretty good (statistically as good as Edwards' season this year and look at the general praise he's getting for it) and his first 3 years were as good or better than 80% of players of those respective ages.
What a load of rubbish, seriously. Do you want me to show some stats to prove how wrong you are or do you just want to go straight to saying "stats are meaningless" and agreeing to disagree?
Punxsutawney Phil said:So his hip is the reason he provided nothing for 3/4 of a season? When did he do his hips....round 1? If they were so bad why did he play 13 senior games? Because he had surgery at the end of the year does it mean he had the injury for the whole year, or did he get it just prior....he had 30+ touches in the 2s the week before.
Doesn't make much sense to me. Why play a guy who is not contributing to the side if he is injured?
Players have end of season surgery all the time....doesn't mean they played the entire season with that injury...
Provided nothing? He played essentially the same position Nahas, King and Nason did for parts of the year and averaged the same amount of touches as they did and had more effective tackles and 1%ers than any of them. I know he was ordinary but lets not exaggerate too much.
According to KFCTiger they knew about his problems for a couple of months. Why they played him instead of getting the surgery immediately I don't know.
Barnzy said:That's because he's just an average player. Half a good season in a whole career.
His 2009 season was very good as a whole. You don't have to play 22 great games to call it a good season Jimmy. His 2008 was also pretty good (statistically as good as Edwards' season this year and look at the general praise he's getting for it) and his first 3 years were as good or better than 80% of players of those respective ages.
Barnzy said:Will always be limited with his lack of football IQ. His skills are technically okay, just always manages to pick the wrong option. Never seen a player so dumb on the field.
What a load of rubbish, seriously. Do you want me to show some stats to prove how wrong you are or do you just want to go straight to saying "stats are meaningless" and agreeing to disagree?