Re: Tambling [Merged]
I am sure someone, most likely Port Adelaide, the scrapheap for Richmond rejects, would take Tambling. Many are pointing to GC. I personally can't see why GC would take Tambling. They can take one uncontracted from every club but this doesn't guarantee they will take a player from every club if it doesn't warrant it. If we're looking to increase Tambling's value by playing him regardless, I think we would have been better claiming him as a long-term injured and selling his merits for next year. He's been a shambles. In a way its pretty sad now that he gets jeered when he touches the ball. I blame the football club for this, as clearly he shouldn't be gifted games when he is not currently up to it (whether form-wise, physically wise or mentally wise - or all of the above). It's just not the right thing to do on so many levels.
Barnzy said:Real question is SCOOP, why would want anyone want to trade for him? Hopefully someone is dumb enough to take him off our hands but if not he's delist material. Time to cut our losses.
I am sure someone, most likely Port Adelaide, the scrapheap for Richmond rejects, would take Tambling. Many are pointing to GC. I personally can't see why GC would take Tambling. They can take one uncontracted from every club but this doesn't guarantee they will take a player from every club if it doesn't warrant it. If we're looking to increase Tambling's value by playing him regardless, I think we would have been better claiming him as a long-term injured and selling his merits for next year. He's been a shambles. In a way its pretty sad now that he gets jeered when he touches the ball. I blame the football club for this, as clearly he shouldn't be gifted games when he is not currently up to it (whether form-wise, physically wise or mentally wise - or all of the above). It's just not the right thing to do on so many levels.