jb03 said:The vitriol each side of the political spectrum hold for the leader of the opposite side never ceases to amaze me. With all the talkback I heard today on radio not one person stated he thought one side win but they were voting for the other. Any views given by anyone on politics are tainted with bias - one only has to read Remotes' and Livers' posts on this thread (and that is not a criticism, just a fact).
I actually can't quite fathom why Howard has become so hated. Same with Keating.
Life rarely changes a great deal regardless of who is in power but at least at the moment we have Federal Liberal balanced by State Labor.
Ever since 1901 he who controls the middle ground of Australian Politics forms Government - hence a drive from the left towards the middle by Rudd - pushing his stamp on his cabinet and being swift to remove any strong handed unionists from the ALP and of course his conservative economics - all the while Howard is pushing from the right to the middle - through his backflips on Climate and softening of AWAs with the fairness board and his new Aboriginal policies.
The majority of Australians want middle of the road - they are comfortable there.
As for your statement about Federal and State Governments being different provides a check and a balance - nothing could be further from the truth - no matter which party holds govenment in either domain they always fight and blame the other.
The only real form of checks and balances in the Federal Government is the "House of Review" the Senate - and proof of that is the last 3 years where the Government has held a majority in the Senate and pushed through Right wing philosophies which have taken Australian towards the right of the politcal spectrum - away from the middle which has made Australians uncomfortable - remember they like the middle of the spectrum - and that is why Howard is not liked. (Keating did the same thing in 1996 - but he was leaning/dressed to the left)