Some interesting parallels with young Steves' AFL career. Maybe MM should extend the same courtesies as part of his learning curve.
I will say this about MM's analysis ability from a game day coaching perspective. He is excellent.
Half way through the 2nd Q , he had seen enough to know that it wasn't a day for tall marking forwards. He had also presumably, felt that Richmond had the ascendancy in the game at this point. He proposed that if Richmond REALLY WANTED TO WIN the game, they had to roll the dice early with their substitution, and bring on another fast running player ( Matt White) and really take it up to Geelong by replacing Miller who was only attracting a 3-4 defender ( supposedly Geelong preferred the ball in his hands) and doing little defensively. He said it was risky to utilize your sub so early, but sometimes when the game is there to be won, you have to take risks, and the risk was mitigated by its' corrective nature, structure wise, and the fact it would be a HUGE WIN for Richmond, announce their arrival, and kick -start their season. All sound points . All hard to argue with . He argued that our run and carry was the main reason we were in a position to really put a break on geelong, and we should be at that point in time looking to put them under as much perceivable pressure as possible. Put it down to experience/ knowledge/ imagination, but I sometimes think Dimmas' gameday coaching is a little too reactive - and even then, too slow - rather than proactive. He questions the boys' ability to win games, but I question his.
I would love to have MM in the box like Thompson @ the Bombers,
I know it's an easier call to be made from the comfort of a commentary box, but it was instinctive, and I suspect correct.