CarnTheTiges said:Nice, unfortunately our opponent isn't Bugs Bunny and come to think of it the wascally wabbit generally outsmarted Tazz.
Was always an interesting clash when Tazz met up with Yosemite Sam
CarnTheTiges said:Nice, unfortunately our opponent isn't Bugs Bunny and come to think of it the wascally wabbit generally outsmarted Tazz.
ninjahaha said:Funny how my lameness opened the gate for you to finely let out your interesting idea and foresight, "play's his favourites!"
Tony Braxton-Hicks said:Didn't we do this with Arnott? He'd have to agree to it, I'm sure.
I don't remember Sam and Tazz ever tangling. I did wonder in the Tazzmania TV show (yes he got his own show) why he was the same as always, yet the rest of the Devil family (Mum, Dad, brother and sister) wore clothes and spoke intelligibly, and for some reason his father acted and spoke the same as Bing Crosby.craig said:Was always an interesting clash when Tazz met up with Yosemite Sam
tigerlove said:As far as Morris is concerned that's the only conclusion I can make. Human nature, happens to all of us in every walk of life.
Chimptastic said:We should define 'favourites'...
If it means selecting your favourite buddy around the club to get a game, then no I don't believe Dimma selects favourites.
If it means selecting or rewarding particular desirable team traits / leadership traits / attitude traits, then yes he plays favourites.
JimJessTorp said:Like Baloo - I love Steve. He hasn't done very well this year so its right he should be dropped.
But just in case anyone was convinced he never offered anything to the team have a look at the linked highlight reel...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c54SvkgQ04A
Cheers
Baloo said:Yeah, the favourites tag is natural. A Beavis favourite would be a player that' follows instructions, does what he is asked to do and gives it his all even if it's to the detriment of self.
Tames said:If Dimma said he was happy with the way he played last week, why has he been dropped? How many are on the selection, as clearly he has been overruled?
Tames said:If Dimma said he was happy with the way he played last week, why has he been dropped? How many are on the selection, as clearly he has been overruled?
I think he was selected last week purely and completely on the basis/belief that he bothers Yarran, and as he was considered one of Carlton's threats he got the nod.Tames said:If Dimma said he was happy with the way he played last week, why has he been dropped? How many are on the selection, as clearly he has been overruled?
Absolutely spot on!IanG said:Don't think he's been overruled its just that what he says publicly and what hew says and privately are 2 different things. The public comments are aimed at not embarrassing players except in exceptional circumstances.
Tenacious said:Absolutely spot on!
It amuses me when people try and base an argument on a totally literal transcript of what a coach (or politician or whoever) might say at a press conference.
He's not out in the warm up eitherTony Braxton-Hicks said:Not at the VFL game
Tenacious said:It amuses me when people try and base an argument on a totally literal transcript of what a coach (or politician or whoever) might say at a press conference.
tigerlove said:Some happen to think Dimma has favourites that he struggles to let go. Sure Dimma and the match committee are in the best place to judge but it doesn't mean there aren't some astute observers on here who may disagree with them. it's not the first time the heirarchy have been wrong in recruitment, contracts and team selection and it won't be the last. I firmly believe if the Tiger's mantra that players are elevated and dropped from and to the VFL on form that McDonough should have been elevated a long time ago ahead of other players. So yes I, and it appears many others, do believe Dimma has been wrong in continually gifting Morris games at the expense of McDonough. And yes the position was created for Morris as Kingy's old role included kicking goals and making the play when it was your turn whereas it has seemed for Morris that it's been solely a lock down role (basically a tagger in the forward line).
I find it silly when someone tries to shut down another's argument on the basis of the coach and committee know best so we should all just shut up. I prefer arguments from those who think for themselves. That's what makes PRE such a great site, many clever posters with interesting ideas and foresight.