Coburgtiger said:If you're trying to open a can, and someone hands you a glass can opener, you can either grit your teeth and cut your hands to shreds, or go to the shed and see if another tool might do the job.
Or you can pull the ring-top.
Coburgtiger said:If you're trying to open a can, and someone hands you a glass can opener, you can either grit your teeth and cut your hands to shreds, or go to the shed and see if another tool might do the job.
leon said:Or you can pull the ring-top.
Some are TL. Given that Hampson is so ineffective around the ground I think we would have been better having no recognised ruckman and played Vickery and Griffiths in the ruck in 2016. Others have argued that as well.tigerlove said:The argument that Leon often brings to the table is that no-one else on our list could have done better and therefore Hampson deserves to be first ruck. I don't think many are arguing that point
Much of what you said is correct about that final in 2013.Dyer'ere said:On the Ivan dynamic of (was it 2013?), he didn't jump at the CBs. So he could keep his feet and block or gather at ground level to set up close-to-the-fall clearances. Carlton deployed in that final to tap the ball cleanly to space (away from Richmond's plan) and destroy the match. So that tactic was exposed.
Ivan's job was only to hit the elbow of the opposing ruck (don't be too literal - or nostalgic), bring it to the ground and he had to be the biggest mid at the fall. He did that really well. But it was one-dimensional and certain to be picked apart at a crucial time. It was picked apart after half time in that Carlton final. Warnock was useless for most of his career but he was the antidote to our CB set up after half time. Nine clearances to Bryce Gibbs.
We needed a counter to the usually lame Warnock threat. Just somebody who could touch the ball in the air. Somebody like Hampson. (But preferably better.)
We got Hampson. So, yeah. Nah. Not ideal.
2017 be an interesting year in the life of the Hamster career.
There's not doubt we're changing his role and we're changing our midfield set up. Hampervan improved markedly in 2016 but still wasn't there. Nankervis is a very raw prospect. I guess neither is a premiership ruckman as it stands. Not even a #2.
But sometimes when a team gets beat the gimp gets too much blame. Hampson has been that gimp on and off. He's not the core problem. Not to say he's not a weakness.
2017 will see new dynamics and through them we can observe just how much Hampson was the clearance blockage of 2016 and how much a lack of midfield clearance power was central.
Interesting times. (We live in them.)
leon said:Did it take you two weeks to think this up?
leon said:Directly above in your first post, you state: "... despite leon's constant drivel ..." Not an 'aggressive, derogatory posting style' by any chance?
But, of course, you 'happen to think though that people should respect others.'
Then you go, "... blah blah blah. It's all baloney." I could get offended here. Get off your high horse, TL, you don't practice what you preach clearly. There's a name for that.
leon said:As for the final paragraph, I had responded to your earlier post where you provided loaded stats with biased interpretation, to attempt to convince everyone of your position. I, for one, disagreed and sought to expose these flimsy arguments. Mostly I simply dispute posts that are blatantly derogatory without much realistic evidence. Like yours. But good to see you now agree with my overall position.
leon said:I was a total supporter of the club's recruitment of Nankervis as our ruck depth is truly thin now after losing 3 talls. He offers something different: a few more HBs, but less than half the HOs, more tackles but H actually takes more marks. However, expect we'll play both allowing Griffiths to play almost entirely forward. The AFL curtailing of 3rd man up may well assist Hampson too.
Sintiger said:Some are TL. Given that Hampson is so ineffective around the ground I think we would have been better having no recognised ruckman and played Vickery and Griffiths in the ruck in 2016. Others have argued that as well.
We didn't try it and we should have. The bulldogs actually won a flag with two KPPs in Roughead and Boyd interchanging in the ruck. Before 2016 Vickery and Griffiths had arguably done as much if not more in their careers than those two. Boyd was playing VFL and Roughead was playing ok footy as a key defender.lukeanddad said:I would rather Hampson winning in the ruck and ineffectual around the ground, than Vickery who was actually a negative influence in the ruck and close to ineffectual elsewhere.
We are placing a lot of faith in what Nank can bring to the table.
I like Nankervis. He reminds me of a fgresh version of Maric with the aggression of Greg StaffordSintiger said:We didn't try it and we should have. The bulldogs actually won a flag with two KPPs in Roughead and Boyd interchanging in the ruck. Before 2016 Vickery and Griffiths had arguably done as much if not more in their careers than those two. Boyd was playing VFL and Roughead was playing ok footy as a key defender.
Apart from the odd cameo up forward Griffiths has played some of his best footy as a marking follower imo.
I don't have any great expectations of Nankervis except that he hopefully does more outside the ruck contest than Hampson and to be honest that isn't a very high expectation.
Dyer'ere said:Just announced he's on the LTI list due his back problems. No surgery.
Soldo is auditioning this weekend.
bullus_hit said:At least we planned for this, Nank now becomes our most important recruit.
He needs a heart transplant before considering him for rucking dutiesBiddiscombeSkills said:Elton needs to be given VFL ruck duties, stat