lamb22 said:
If Hampson taps to us, we are still down 4-3 in clearance players at centre contests. If Hampson taps to them we are effectively playing 3 to their 5 in centre contests.
Asolutely horrible player. We got beaten about 14 -10 in centre clearances and they usually got a run on when Hampson went in there.
If we cant get a benefit in clearances there is absolutely no reason to play Hampson.
Hardwick reckons he goes alright though so lets await the extension.
And you simply reverse that logic and those numbers when we intercept a tap from their opposing ruckman. You keep twisting logic - Hampson does not deliberately tap to the opposition. He is attempting to knock it where our guys are meant to be. But players like Ablett, Selwood, Mitchell, Swallow read the play so much better they often beat our guys to the drop. Top mids do this for virtually all rucks. The ruckman cannot totally control this. He is not operating solo in a vacuum. A clearance is not the automatic outcome of a winning HO - there are multiple other variables. But I want a winning ruck at CBs to have the best opportunity of winning the clearance. When the midfield loses a clearance it may be due to movements and factors at ground level, not the fault of tapping the ball down - e.g. smarts and toughness is a big factor, along with great anticipation and hands.
You make out that Hampson does absolutely nothing else because you are so in denial about him. You have backed yourself into a corner where you refuse to concede he is an excellent tap ruckman and we certainly have none better. Although Griff is a very handy back-up and developing; but as I have stated way back, he is also a strong forward option too.
I am the first to agree H is a limited player: clumsy, unco and makes some errors so bad you don't know whether to laugh or cry. But he did some good things today, as he has in other games, besides HOs. You just have to be so right about it, you're blind. He can improve and I actually think Hammer is showing signs of it from just getting continuity as No.1 ruck, not missing from injury etc. He does some bullocking, shepherding and tackles (or attempts because not quick enough to catch many). Marking is unreliable to awful but not without hope. He was beaten around the ground by Daw, but most of the side had a shocker.
You've had the wrong player in the gun all along - always Hammer, sometimes Griff - never Vickery. Please don't try to keep telling me, or most on here, he is a more useful and valuable player for RFC. Generally Ty is just embarrassing as was today and will never make a true centre ruck because he avoids body contact. Happy to see McBean given a go instead of TV; or better still someone like Callum Moore who is the fast, high-marking, athletic tall we need up there instead of two slows.