taztiger4 said:or our mids cant read his taps
CD call it Hit outs sharked. I asked them on Twitter if they could include it in their HUN stars but they said its up to the HUN.lamb22 said:Just shows how overrated the HOTA stat is. 43% and we lost centre clearances 14 - 10.
BTW does anyone know if there is a HOTD stat as Hammer seems to tap it to the other side a lot.
Got a feeling NicNat, Sandi n Goldy are fairly good at hitting their blokes on the tit regularly. Just as importantly the three of them are also excellent at using their two metre plus, hundred kg bodies to get in the way of opposition mids n breaking up congestion around the ball up.leon said:And if it doesn't hit them on the tits, it must be the ruckman's fault?
I concur wholeheartedlyTigerMasochist said:Got a feeling NicNat, Sandi n Goldy are fairly good at hitting their blokes on the tit regularly. Just as importantly the three of them are also excellent at using their two metre plus, hundred kg bodies to get in the way of opposition mids n breaking up congestion around the ball up.
Hamsters a decent tap ruckman, good luck if you know where he's tapping it to, does very little of the secondary efforts n still a liability around the ground more often than not.
Yes he done well against Mould Coast, probably near a career best game but he's twenty eight n been mediocre for virtually all his career.
If he sets this game as around his standard mark over the rest of his career, then the best he'll ever be is handy, guess we might have to be content with that.
tigertim said:Whilst Hampy has improved over the last few weeks you only have to look at what Max Gawn is doing as a ruckman to see the benchmark. Daylight between Max and Shaun.
K3 said:Gawn had 27 disposals, 31 hit outs and kicked 3 goals.
While I can understand the club's PR about Hampervan, I hope he keeps improving as we are still miles behind so many teams in this part of the game.
Bullarto Tiger said:Is battling away and doing his bit as best as possible, but he will never be in the top echelon of ruckmen and will remain vulnerable to being exploited around the ground by his opposing number.
leon said:Correct, will never be top echelon, I simply argue he is the best we have at present, whatever the reasons (which we cannot change now). He does compete and win many HOs against most of his rivals. Isn't it also a positive that he is giving us more than expected, and more than many posters on here expected, if they are honest?
He gives us time to find another quality young ruckman, by draft or trade, over the next year or two, maybe at worst. Really don't know much about Soldo but not many on here rate him that highly ATM.
Bullarto Tiger said:Yes, Leon, Hampson is the 'best' ruckman RFC has got for the time-being, hence many people's concern about the state of ruck stocks on the list.
And, yes, it is a positive that he is giving more than would be expected by most (but he is coming off a low base in this regard) ... guess you can't wish for any more from a player that is selected to take the field.
The time to find a quality ruckman (or one on the verge of being so) is the season's end. This issue has to be addressed immediately.
5SKULL5 said:I'd be more inclined to look at:
Jack Hannath / Freo.
leon said:It depends on what you want or choose to spend on? If you want to go for a more mature, ready-to-go ruckman like e.g. Nichols. So are you prepared to give up our No. 1 pick for someone like that? What about the extra big-bodied mid we badly need (more IMO)? Have posted about this prior, not sure anyone answered. Have no 2nd rd pick; 3rd will not cut it, obviously.
But could draft a good young prospect high in the draft. Then he will need some years to develop; that's what Hampson offers - cover for that development time.
So just tell us where this quality ruckman is, and how you plan to get him.
tigertim said:Anyway, Ive come around to the Grant Thomas line of thinking that rucks are superfluous ( in general)
I'd be looking at developing someone like Chol to become a "ruck" that then becomes a midfielder who gets possessions around the ground.
tigertim said:The ruckman just has to be better than Hampson. Now I don't know the intricacies of all rucks contractual obligations at this point in time so I cant say WHO that ruckman is.
But the last thing I'd want to do is sit on my hands ( as we have done) and say "it's all too hard, lets just keep the status quo" and roll around again with Hampy as first ruck. I'd like to think the tree can be shaken.
Sandilands? he says "no"
Goldstein? He says "no"
Gawn: he says "no"
Mumford? he says "no"
Jacobs: "no"
and so on until you get down to the level of ruck that you don't want...ie Hampson.
Who of other clubs second tier rucks are worth a trade? Sam Naismith from Sydney?
Scour the state leagues. Darcy Cameron from Claremont?
But I agree the quality of rucks after the first half dozen or so really levels out to the likes Witts, Gorringe, Longer, Ceglar etc.
Anyway, Ive come around to the Grant Thomas line of thinking that rucks are superfluous ( in general)
I'd be looking at developing someone like Chol to become a "ruck" that then becomes a midfielder who gets possessions around the ground. ie like Gawn had 27 on Monday.
Hampy averages around 7 and most rucks are around 10.