17 said:Because they are not up to AFL standard.
tigermouseau said:And hampson is? 4th in line at carlscum, hardly a good endorsement.
17 said:4th in line as Carlton have 4 talls competing.
Same situation as when they let Sam Jacobs go to Adelaide - turns out it was a great deal for Adelaide.
No point coveting another club's ruckman if the player and/or his club doesn't want to leave/let him go.
Trade week is the art of the achievable.
The Swans made an art form of this by paying reasonable prices and getting deals done - and went on to win won two flags.
And for all those saying Hampson is a spud/dud/etc, I'll raise you Max Bailey.
High teen's draft pick, three kneee reco's, less than 50 games in 7 years, no-one's idea of an elite ruckman, and yet just played in a premiership side.
miastar said:Will we get compensation picks for White and McGuane?
17 said:And for all those saying Hampson is a spud/dud/etc, I'll raise you Max Bailey.
High teen's draft pick, three kneee reco's, less than 50 games in 7 years, no-one's idea of an elite ruckman, and yet just played in a premiership side.
bullus_hit said:Bailey has just retired, his body is shot and he couldn't battle through another season. For a second rounder, we should be aiming at a 150 gamer, I highly doubt that Hampson will even manage 100 games.
I agree with this. It's what Carter suggested in the Two Rucks thread. Vickery to be pretty much permanent forward, with Maric and Hampson sharing the ruck and the heat in the forward line. These two will combine as Dyer'ere's No.1 forward, providing structure, standing under the long ball and taking the hits, allowing TV and Jack to play their natural games without getting crushed.Coburgtiger said:There's a lot of conjecture in this thread about Hampson putting pressure on Ty or Maric...
If we are going to get Hampson, then we're doing so because we want to play all three talls. Our structure looked the best this year with Vickery as a forward, and two genuine rucks. It's something Hardwick wants. If we were going to have a third to just play VFL and put pressure on Tyrone to perform, the Orren would do.
RFC_Official said:All depends on their contracts at their new clubs. If they get signed to big money deals, chances are high.
A player has served eight or more seasons of AFL football at one club, is NOT one of the top 25 per cent highest-paid players at his club, and is now out of contract for the first time since reaching eight seasons of service. (unrestricted free agent)
.....
His original club will receive a compensation pick for the loss of the player, on an AFL-determined formula to apply where clubs lose more free agents than they gain in any single transfer period. link
17 said:The point was more that contributors can come from the more unlikely sources.
100 games would still be a better contribution than probably 80% of 2nd rounders.
Bennnny said:His kicking for goal is not great is it?
bullus_hit said:This is the benchmark we should be aspiring to, not continually going down the stop-gap route.
bullus_hit said:Technically it's not dreadful but he can turn to jelly when the heat is on. Put it this way, if he had a match winning kick after the buzzer, I'd be very worried.
bullus_hit said:I don't disagree with the first point, but bit players shouldn't be acquired using premium picks. As for the second statement, 80% maybe true of Richmond, but certainly not some of the more successful clubs going around. As as been mentioned on the pick 28 thread, guys like Beams, Hannebury, Duncan, Roughead, Gunston & Bradley Hill were all secured with a similar pick. This is the benchmark we should be aspiring to, not continually going down the stop-gap route.