The Cotch said:I just assumed all along GWS or Brisbane would take him, but now hearing this, I honestly can't contain myself.
GEDS1 said:Sounds a gamble but myabe one worth taking in this shallow draft - if he is still around, reckon others will punt on him first.
Streak said:That is what the article was inferring. It said that both Richmond and Brisbane had this kid going around the 12-16 mark. The idea seemed to be the Tigers would take him if he was there.
I wish I had a link to the article, but it doesn't seem to have made it up on the West's website.
tigs2010 said:oh well if Brisbane take him they can't take Docherty so we will end up with him.
Streak said:I think there is a silver lining in this for sure.
Leysy Days said:Yeah its an interesting one.
Unless he can play high in the forward line nearly full-time (of which leysy has no idea BTW), then really it is almost the last spot we need with Jack & TV on the books.
bullus_hit said:I haven't seen him this year so maybe he's developed a bit in twelve months but my initial reservations still stand. We've tried the lead-up forward many times in the past and it just doesn't seem to work particularly well. We wasted pick 12 on Schulz, pick 24 on Hughes, pick 51 on Limbach, you could even throw in Pettifer given he didn't really have a defensive side to his game. If anybody has any information to the contrary please interject but how is a guy who ran 13.08 in his beep test going to exert the necessary pressure required of a third tall?
Personally, I'd rather grab a guy like O'Hanlon with pick 55 and put the same amount of time building up his endurance, he's just as much chance of playing in the midfield as Kersten IMO.
Danog said:I think Tomlinson will be gone at 7. He's not "worth" that much, but GWS need some talls, and Brisbane will take him at 8 if they don't.
Long Lost Hernaman said:I would have thought there are 3 types that end up playing the role.
2 types do it well.
The first category is the Chapman, O'Keefe type player. Brilliant at running the lines up and back, finding the footy, kicking long goals or finding a team mate in a good position. These types end up in the role but could just as readily play wing, half back or in the middle because they're just great players.
The second category is the freaky Stevie J type. These are very hard to find and probably diamonds in the rough. Using high draft picks to explore for these types is filled with danger. Someone gave Pettifer as an example and there are many others.
The third type might be adequate in a good side for a while but not sustainably good enough in a poor side or when he becomes the second or first forward. Think Stu Edwards, Jurica, P Bowden, Pearce, Williams etc.
Sintiger said:Just took a quick look at another board and FWIW its being reported that Emma Quayle tweeted that there was no substance to the rumour that we would take Kersten at 15 . She said that Docherty will either be a Lion at 12 or a Tiger at 15 .
If someone has access to Twitter and follows Emma maybe they can verify this .
Sintiger said:Just took a quick look at another board and FWIW its being reported that Emma Quayle tweeted that there was no substance to the rumour that we would take Kersten at 15 . She said that Docherty will either be a Lion at 12 or a Tiger at 15 .
If someone has access to Twitter and follows Emma maybe they can verify this .