In fairness TP Naismith was just a bit of insurance after Soldo left. So it din't work out.As a poster said earlier he really hasn’t improved from day one so how is three more years going to help him? He’s been four years on a list and is still uncompetitive and physically struggling against smaller players. He gets out marked by blokes 20cm shorter than him.
I was looking forward today to see if he changed and if his game would improve, but it was the same insipid output. The ball just waltzes out of his area because he’s left ball watching and flat footed . Hartley’s list management has fallen off the cliff since 2022.
TT
JH
JGTI should’ve got a first rounder
Dow should’ve been delisted after two years
Grimes extra year
Ryan three years
Short five years
Naismith and Tarrant were high risk and although cheap it’s took up space for a player to be developed. We’ve basically gone back to band aid recruiting of the 90’s.
These lads all played today minus the last two so it’s on him for our failures.
What they have got wrong is over rating the quality of ruckman we had on our list.
Nankervis, Naismith, Colina lol, OH-B sheesh another non footballer did we need two. The funny thing is he actually shows some good signs.
Then of Course Ryan.
Sometimes clubs do have the numbers, you would think 5 Ruckmen would be enough on any teams list.
What too often gets lost in translation is the quality that is actually there.
Someone said once and it stuck with me. If you are going to only take late nd picks and rookies in an area then you better take plenty of them.
The odds are most will fail. I think this is the case here.
like so many things in life you get out what you put in.