-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Reece Conca - so long and thanks for all the fish
- Thread starter Baloo
- Start date
Re: Reece Conca
Im not going to go through all the data but draft pick 6 seems to be a bust over all draft. He may be only one of a handful to have played 100+ games as a pick 6. Injury has probably robbed him another 80 games and the lack of continuity never allowed him to fulfill his potential.
thegdog said:
Im not going to go through all the data but draft pick 6 seems to be a bust over all draft. He may be only one of a handful to have played 100+ games as a pick 6. Injury has probably robbed him another 80 games and the lack of continuity never allowed him to fulfill his potential.
Re: Reece Conca
seriously?
A player isn't a star therefore he's a bust. Super nuanced analysis there pal.
thegdog said:
seriously?
A player isn't a star therefore he's a bust. Super nuanced analysis there pal.
Re: Reece Conca
signs are his croc days are over. Played most of the year, recovered quick from a bad and unlucky injury. A walk up start in the side who dominated the season. It depends on the pay, it won't be silly. 4 years on mid-tier dough for a side that is trying to build is good buying. simple.
SCOOP said:
signs are his croc days are over. Played most of the year, recovered quick from a bad and unlucky injury. A walk up start in the side who dominated the season. It depends on the pay, it won't be silly. 4 years on mid-tier dough for a side that is trying to build is good buying. simple.
E
easy_tiger
Guest
Re: Reece Conca
4 years seems too long given his history. Well done to his management he’d be crazy not to take it.
Didn’t show anything extra in big games that makes you think he’s anything more than an average foot soldier. As long as u pay him accordingly that is ok.
SCOOP said:
4 years seems too long given his history. Well done to his management he’d be crazy not to take it.
Didn’t show anything extra in big games that makes you think he’s anything more than an average foot soldier. As long as u pay him accordingly that is ok.
Re: Reece Conca
If not quite often - he's always had a tendency to cause a turnover out of nothing when it looks like he couldn't possibly miss the target if he tried.
But he also did the hard stuff and tackled well in the contest. Never stopped trying.
If he goes - good luck to him.
Razorgang2 said:
If not quite often - he's always had a tendency to cause a turnover out of nothing when it looks like he couldn't possibly miss the target if he tried.
But he also did the hard stuff and tackled well in the contest. Never stopped trying.
If he goes - good luck to him.
Re: Reece Conca
Yes agreed, Ten. Just sayin that although I never doubted his ability to create a contest, once he had it though, I was never confident he could do something with it.
Tenacious said:
Yes agreed, Ten. Just sayin that although I never doubted his ability to create a contest, once he had it though, I was never confident he could do something with it.
