Re: Reece Conca
No trade required if he wants to leave. He's an UFA. No compo either due to Lynch coming. The afl work it as net gain vs net loss.
So we wouldn't get anything for him unless Freo have a FA leaving and they do a miniscule trade so it doesn't affect their compo. I don't know if they have or not though
RedanTiger said:The thing to remember about Reece is that this has been floated before.
Over the past few years, due to his injury record, we have only offered him fairly low contract terms.
It's been floated, probably by his manager, that the WA clubs were interested in him.
The club has generally said "Well, if you get an offer, we'll consider it". No serious offer has been forthcoming and so he has stayed on a low pay rate.
This year he has fought his way into being in our best 22 and the offers may have become more serious.
That's understandable but I don't think our attitude will change much. Maybe a little bit more money is being offered by us.
If he gets a much better, serious offer then I think both he and we will accept it.
That's really fine and fair to both parties.
He gets a much better deal and we can get a much better trade deal.
No trade required if he wants to leave. He's an UFA. No compo either due to Lynch coming. The afl work it as net gain vs net loss.
So we wouldn't get anything for him unless Freo have a FA leaving and they do a miniscule trade so it doesn't affect their compo. I don't know if they have or not though