YinnarTiger said:I think you meant to address Knighter's Revenge.
Apologies for that. I'll edit my post.
YinnarTiger said:I think you meant to address Knighter's Revenge.
KnightersRevenge said:So tell me how racism gets better if you don't confront it? Until the little boy points at the emperor everyone just goes along.
rosy23 said:It was deleted because as I'm sure you are aware we aren't allowed to post from the official AFL websites other than richmondfc.com.au No doubt you're aware of that but just to reaffirm
We once again have official permission from the RFC to post the content from their website onto PRE. As with all articles the source must be mentioned and a link to the article provided. Please also refrain from posting links to the official AFL site.
We aren't permitted to post any articles from the other official AFL websites and cooperation in that regard would be gratefully appreciated.
Rather than call me pathetic you could abide by the site rules that apply to all of us. :blah
rosy23 said:Firstly you might have missed this post Yinnar. I've asked you a question in response to you quoting and addressing your post to me.
I'll ask again here
In regards to your post above I don't get your point in relation to my comment really. Of course racism needs addressing. It doesn't require confrontation or abuse to do it though. Goodes pretended to throw a spear at a group of fans in a manner that he said was in anger. How does that help racism get better? *Would it be acceptable if someone in the crowd did a similar thing to him? (* rhetorical question there)
KnightersRevenge said:I'm a little confused are asking me to answer or Yinnar?
..........
LeeToRainesToRoach said:How did Goodes confront racism? His speeches were mainly about dispossession.
I've been totally unable to work out what it is that Aboriginals seek. I'm sure Goodes meant well, but he didn't help me to understand. He was pushing for recognition of Aboriginals in the Constitution which I don't have a problem with in principle, although I would've thought it's actually drawing distinctions based on race.
If Goodesy wants to talk about racism - not dispossession, not booing - I'll listen.
rosy23 said:I edited my post to correct the error. I'm sure it wasn't that hard to work out just the same considering the link. Look forward to your answer.
KnightersRevenge said:......
I am asking how it gets better if those offended and more importantly discriminated against don't use confrontation to drag it out of the shadows and into the light? Why is your method (without confrontation) preferable to the person who is actually living it?
YinnarTiger said:Yeah, you're not racist but you're still going to stand alongside the racists and boo?
bruntonave. said:There is nothing imaginary about it.
If Goodes was not indigenous and had not been an outspoken australian-of-the-year, this would not be happening.
rosy23 said:Yet again you're asking me to think on behalf of others. I wouldn't have a clue what is preferable to others. Adam Goodes is the only person I know who is making an issue of his stance way of spruiking on a football podium. I think his approach and methods have done far more harm than good. He's confrontational and engenders an us against them attitude.
KnightersRevenge said:He highlights issues that most don't really want to admit are a feature of Australian society. I imagine if he descided to go to university after he leaves football and study for it he could provide a dissertation worthy of your time? For now he is a footy player doing his best with the limited tools and time he's got.
KnightersRevenge said:I look forward to you discovering that you are focussed on the wrong end of this issue and that by continually posting about Goodes and not endemic racism you detract from the issue and provide cover for racists to keep on keeping on.
LeeToRainesToRoach said:How can I do more to get Aboriginal children to go to school? To get adults into work? To help Aboriginals build safer communities? Please tell me how, or how I am directly or even indirectly responsible for these problems. Because that's what Goodesy has implied.
KnightersRevenge said:You can vote for parties that don't support things like the NT Intervention. You can ask your local member why so little has been acheived in the areas you just highlighted and make sure that they know that when you vote these issues influence your decision.
SCOOP said:Here's a novel idea.
If you 100% are booing Goodes for your own non racist reasons maybe stop so no one can ever accuse you of being racist.
It's a fair trade off. If any behavior you engage in causes you to have to utter the phrase "I'm not a racist" to defend it, I would think twice about engaging in such behavior again.
Tigers of Old said:If Adam Goodes feels you're being racist towards him when you boo him and then you keep doing it despite his objections then theres no doubt it's racist. Whatever people's reasons for it are/were it's time to stop unless you actually are a racist and are happy to be seen as one.