-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Political correctness & other nonsensical rubbish
- Thread starter Liverpool
- Start date
Liverpool said:
Is it okay to have a fun night over the killing of six million Jews? You have to draw the line somewhere mate, and surely finding something kinky in the the single largest act of genocide in human history is unacceptable.
evo said:
Wearing a swatszika is poor taste, and I think is illegal in Germany. Having a sex party though where the participants pretend to be "processed" before being sent off to the gas chamber though is another.
I wouldn't say it should be made illegal, but I don't think it is socially acceptable.
As for Stalin, Lenin, and Mao's birthday, there is a big difference between celebrating the birth of a despote, and reinacting their murderous acts.
Just read up on Max Mosley’s romp. Dummkopf!!!
If it wasn’t for Hitler (of all people) being a guest at his dad’s wedding which was held in Goebbel’s (of all people) drawing room, I’d just be marveling (yet again) at the mysterious powers of sexual desire.
But apparently ‘zee terrible twozum’ were there all enjoying a fabulously fascist time, and so it’s all a bit too close to home.
I can understand the subsequent explosion of bile.
Don’t think people being upset with Herr Mosley’s mad moments could be classed as political correctness though.
I’m not sure where the culturally left cognoscenti stand on sexual fetishes but I would have thought they viewed sex between consenting adults as a safe haven.
Which is why my Rabbi cross dressing fetish will continue unabated regardless of what the world thinks. Now where did I leave that skull cap and blouse…….
If it wasn’t for Hitler (of all people) being a guest at his dad’s wedding which was held in Goebbel’s (of all people) drawing room, I’d just be marveling (yet again) at the mysterious powers of sexual desire.
But apparently ‘zee terrible twozum’ were there all enjoying a fabulously fascist time, and so it’s all a bit too close to home.
I can understand the subsequent explosion of bile.
Don’t think people being upset with Herr Mosley’s mad moments could be classed as political correctness though.
I’m not sure where the culturally left cognoscenti stand on sexual fetishes but I would have thought they viewed sex between consenting adults as a safe haven.
Which is why my Rabbi cross dressing fetish will continue unabated regardless of what the world thinks. Now where did I leave that skull cap and blouse…….
TigerGoneNorth said:
We shouldn't be flexible at all when it comes to history....as that is distorting history to appease what society expects in this moralistic world.
If something happens then that is it...it happens.....people can have OPINIONS on whether what happened was right or wrong....but the fact still remains, it happened.
Look at this "flexibility" here....simply fabricating and distorting history to appease the political correct masses out there.
The FACT is that it was 3 white firemen who raised the flag. That is what happened. That is history.
What we are now seeing with the statue is Sixpack's "flexibility" at work....which isn't history but simply a myth and a fabrication of the history that these political correct wowsers want to see.
Racial Changes Made in Ground Zero Firefighter Tribute
It happened more than two weeks ago, but at least one New York City firefighter is still steaming over the politically correct changes made to a sculpted tribute to the firefighter heroes who raised the American flag at Ground Zero just hours after the World Trade Center was leveled on 9/11.
The three flag-raising fireman, as depicted in a widely publicized photograph taken by New Jersey's Bergen Record, were white.
But when a statue commemorating the event was unveiled at the FDNY's Brooklyn headquarters on Dec. 21, the three white firefighters had been replaced by a more racially diverse trio of unidentified Fire Department staffers.
The $180,000 statue is the first memorial to the 343 firefighters and emergency medical personnel killed Sept. 11, reported Newsday at the time.
The racial modifications came at the behest of Fire Department officials, artists with Studio EIS, located on York Street in the Dumbo section, told the paper.
Our firefighter-reader complained:
"What Firefighters McWilliams, Johnson and Eisengrein did inspired the people of the United States in one of its darkest hours. ... This photograph is as sacred as the famous photograph and sculpture of the U.S. Marines raising the Flag on Iwo Jima. ...
"The 343 firefighters [who] were killed at the WTC (54 of whom I knew personally) consisted of all races and creeds.
"But the fact is that the three firefighters who hoisted the Flag on the afternoon of Sept. 11th at the WTC were white and should be depicted as such."
Tiger74 said:
Poor taste...I agree....not something that would get me up and going... :hihi
But if that is his private fetish then that is his business.
Did he do it in public? Did he force someone to do something against their will?
No and no.
And it only came to light because the News of the World set him up.
If people want to dress up as Nazis in the privacy of their own bedroom then I couldn't give a stuff.
Disco08 said:
nah. I'd call it 'Adolf Hitlers lounge'. the Bunker bit might put people off 'cos he went out there.
Two topics have caught my eye lately:
I see that people are now talking about banning 'happy hour', upping the price of alcohol, closing pubs earlier, making the legal age 21, etc in a kneejerk reaction to this so-called "binge drinking epidemic".
Alcohol has been around since Adam was a boy....yet all of a sudden, it seems to be in the spotlight as if the thousands of generations before us didn't drink to excess.
Come off it!
Yes, there is a lot more violence these days...but really how much of it is from alcohol....and how much of it is from a combination of alcohol AND drugs?
We already have enough rules and regulations....it is simply time for people to take responsibility for their own actions and for the court system to hand down decent sentences to people who break the law, whether they are under the influence or not.
The other story I saw was this one:
Anglican Church Grammar School bans gay partners at formal
ONE of Queensland's most prestigious boys schools has told final-year students they can't take their gay partners to the senior formal.
Several students at Churchie - the Anglican Church Grammar School - have made it known they want to escort boyfriends to the June 19 formal, but the school is insisting they take a member of the opposite sex.
Churchie headmaster Jonathan Hensman said none of the students had approached him directly, but a staff member had raised the issue on their behalf.
"The senior dinner dance is an opportunity for our young men to escort a young woman in a formal school environment," Mr Hensman said.
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23525256-2,00.html
I can't believe that this school is copping it because they are sticking to the rules they have.
Gays talk about tolerance and acceptance of their way of life....yet people are not tolerating or accepting a school's rules.
Parents and students know full well what morals and ideals a Christian school has before enrolment and if gay students have a problem with this then there is a simple solution.....go to a school that does allow you to take your gay partners to the formal.
This Anglican school has not hidden their idea of morals or sprung this surprise on the students.
People know what to expect from a private Christian school and if people want to talk about respect, tolerance, and acceptance...then I think in this case the gay students need to show some of these virtues towards the school they and their parents had them attend and respect the rules of the school.
I see that people are now talking about banning 'happy hour', upping the price of alcohol, closing pubs earlier, making the legal age 21, etc in a kneejerk reaction to this so-called "binge drinking epidemic".
Alcohol has been around since Adam was a boy....yet all of a sudden, it seems to be in the spotlight as if the thousands of generations before us didn't drink to excess.
Come off it!
Yes, there is a lot more violence these days...but really how much of it is from alcohol....and how much of it is from a combination of alcohol AND drugs?
We already have enough rules and regulations....it is simply time for people to take responsibility for their own actions and for the court system to hand down decent sentences to people who break the law, whether they are under the influence or not.
The other story I saw was this one:
Anglican Church Grammar School bans gay partners at formal
ONE of Queensland's most prestigious boys schools has told final-year students they can't take their gay partners to the senior formal.
Several students at Churchie - the Anglican Church Grammar School - have made it known they want to escort boyfriends to the June 19 formal, but the school is insisting they take a member of the opposite sex.
Churchie headmaster Jonathan Hensman said none of the students had approached him directly, but a staff member had raised the issue on their behalf.
"The senior dinner dance is an opportunity for our young men to escort a young woman in a formal school environment," Mr Hensman said.
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23525256-2,00.html
I can't believe that this school is copping it because they are sticking to the rules they have.
Gays talk about tolerance and acceptance of their way of life....yet people are not tolerating or accepting a school's rules.
Parents and students know full well what morals and ideals a Christian school has before enrolment and if gay students have a problem with this then there is a simple solution.....go to a school that does allow you to take your gay partners to the formal.
This Anglican school has not hidden their idea of morals or sprung this surprise on the students.
People know what to expect from a private Christian school and if people want to talk about respect, tolerance, and acceptance...then I think in this case the gay students need to show some of these virtues towards the school they and their parents had them attend and respect the rules of the school.
Liverpool said:
Drinking alcohol leads to taking drugs in many cases.
Liverpool said:
The school doesn't seem to have any trouble taking their fees even with the knowledge they are homosexual so why not then give them the same rights as the other student to choose a partner for themselves?
Liverpool said:
I heard an interview with a representive from the school yesterday and the formal apparenty is nothing to do with school rules, morals, tolerance, acceptance etc. The emphasis for this particular formal is males and females mixing in society. He said there's no judgement or prejudice against sexuality as a policy.
Disco08 said:
Many cases?
Talk about drawing a long bow...
Disco08 said:
And why shouldn't they take the fees?
They are providing an education to these kids and that is what the fees are paid for.
The onus here is on the students to abide by the rules of the school....rules that they knew full well before signing the enrolment papers.
If a school such as this doesn't conform to the lifestyle of people then don't go there.
