Better than the Baby Bombers . lol a flag in their first year.FOS Draper Allan Shanahan Gerreyn. Incredible.
Better than the Baby Bombers . lol a flag in their first year.FOS Draper Allan Shanahan Gerreyn. Incredible.
Would you want them all in the one year though as I read an article recently of the number of flops you get when you have three or more low picks under 25.? Would it be better to spread them out for safety as too many picks in one draft will end up with some being busts? Even draft apparently which could make life harder as some could be early bloomers and others later. I did enjoy FOS on Sunday as he moved beautifully and with Draper both on our list I think I would sleep comfortably for the next 12-15 years.If the Rioli trade came in as well
That could be say Suns 9 and 13 or so with something coming back for points to them or % salary payments.
Could even look at 9 and Baker for pick 3 & 23 from West Coast.
How would picks 1, 3, 6, 10, 13, 21, 22 (Graham FA) & 23 look like in hitting the draft?
Would be other deals to come too.
That's why we loaded up with a truck load of 3rd & 4th rounders so we could do this.
Would you want them all in the one year though as I read an article recently of the number of flops you get when you have three or more low picks under 25.? Would it be better to spread them out for safety as too many picks in one draft will end up with some being busts? Even draft apparently which could make life harder as some could be early bloomers and others later. I did enjoy FOS on Sunday as he moved beautifully and with Draper I think I would sleep comfortably for the next 12-15 years.
Yeah that’s how I would feel more comfortable in doing it.With Richmonds hand you would be looking to maximize this draft, and have options of doing pick splits, trade for future picks etc.t
Set up next year's draft too and do it again next year for 26.
Could set up the club for say the next 3 (24/25/26) draft by
Pants off party time i like the sound of itIf we could somehow manage a draft hand anywhere near this sort of value. First point of order would be to bid on young Ashcroft with pick 1 n make Brisvegas pay as much as possible to get him, kids fully in the mix for top 3 anyway so *smile* letting a finalist n likely flag contender get him on the cheap. Then after Brisvegas pay as close to full price as possible it would be pants off party time for the Touche recruiter guy.
This is a similar article to the one I read. Worth reading if you haven’t already.If the Rioli trade came in as well
That could be say Suns 9 and 13 or so with something coming back for points to them or % salary payments.
Could even look at 9 and Baker for pick 3 & 23 from West Coast.
How would picks 1, 3, 6, 10, 13, 21, 22 (Graham FA) & 23 look like in hitting the draft?
Would be other deals to come too.
I reckon there is a 50% chance that Baker and Graham goes.
25% chance the above and Bolton goes
5% chance that all of the above happens and Rioli.
Cant ever remember a side removing 4 core players with 3 probably top ten players in the team.
It aint all happening.
A bit of a crude analysis. I didnt read to closely, but they are rating all 1st rd picks as equal, so in 2011 our picks of 15 and 26 are rated against the Saints 2000 picks 1 &2. And the points system is flawed. E.g., Our 2017 draft of Cotchin and Rance is ranked 15 opposed to the Dogs 2012 draft of Stringer, MacRae and Hrovat which got 13.This is a similar article to the one I read. Worth reading if you haven’t already.
Is it possible to have too many first-round draft picks?
It's said that first-round picks are worth their weight in gold, but does it actually work against clubs to hold heaps at a time?www.zerohanger.com
I reckon there is a 50% chance that Baker and Graham goes.
25% chance the above and Bolton goes
5% chance that all of the above happens and Rioli.
Cant ever remember a side removing 4 core players with 3 probably top ten players in the team.
It aint all happening.
You've made some good points, but overall history shows you're not going to be highly successful at nailing the draft with 3 or more picks. Message was sort of lost with their system as you stated, but their point still stands. Five in the first ten would have to be a massively strong draft and rarely happens i would think. We would almost expect the other five picks to be duds and we select the five good ones. History says ain't gunna happen. T he mistakes i'm reading and hearing a lot of from posters and people is basically the more early picks the better. Reasons obviously to accelerate our rebuild, but history shows you really need to nail yes nail three drafts totalling at least 6 guns. We need to be patient otherwise we could mess this up putting all our eggs in one basket.A bit of a crude analysis. I didnt read to closely, but they are rating all 1st rd picks as equal, so in 2011 our picks of 15 and 26 are rated against the Saints 2000 picks 1 &2. And the points system is flawed. E.g., Our 2017 draft of Cotchin and Rance is ranked 15 opposed to the Dogs 2012 draft of Stringer, MacRae and Hrovat which got 13.
Other than the slight risk of trying to play to many highly ranked young kids at once, especially if they are all midfielders, i cannot see how drafting with say picks 1, 3, 6, 8 & 10 in one year is any more or less risky than spreading those same picks across 2 or 3 years.
You've made some good points, but overall history shows you're not going to be highly successful at nailing the draft with 3 or more picks. Message was sort of lost with their system as you stated, but their point still stands. Five in the first ten would have to be a massively strong draft and rarely happens i would think. We would almost expect the other five picks to be duds and we select the five good ones. History says ain't gunna happen.
yes that's a different story again , but we aren't ready for that now as we messed everything up with TT and JH. We've lost two years in the rebuild process and we may still have not bottomed out. Being impatient and too ambitious really set us back.With a huge draft hand and TPP space what's to say Richmond won't also target contracted players with big offers along with hitting the draft hard. Doesn't just have to be this year either as can be done over multiple years.
yes that's a different story again , but we aren't ready for that now as we messed everything up with TT and JH. We've lost two years in the rebuild process and we may still have not bottomed out. Being impatient and too ambitious really set us back.
We tried that , sorry i have to disagree . You go for super quality like Prestia and Lynch when you have a nucleus of young jets and not the other way round otherwise they become a waste. Our kids are basically average at best with no superstars. We need to be patient now as we've dug our own hole and why we've onl;y won two games. Sorry your method is the road to disaster as we don't have a minimum of 6 young jets and 6 A graders on our list, especially if we lose our three fastest, elite and best experienced players in Rioli, Baker and Bolton. We could be left with a lettuce patch full of snails.Not if you target quality players in the right age group. Hit the Free Agency too.
Will have the youth coming through the future drafts as well.
I'm in this camp, too.I reckon you are out on the 1st line. Its the 13th August. Both Baker and Graham are gone IMO - 90% sure of it.
Of the other 2, reckon there is a lot more behind Bolton going than Dan. Not certain on Dan, but reckon Shai will also leave.
If Dan doesn't go, expect to see us go hard for GC's 1st pick.
You've made some good points, but overall history shows you're not going to be highly successful at nailing the draft with 3 or more picks. Message was sort of lost with their system as you stated, but their point still stands. Five in the first ten would have to be a massively strong draft and rarely happens i would think. We would almost expect the other five picks to be duds and we select the five good ones. History says ain't gunna happen. T he mistakes i'm reading and hearing a lot of from posters and people is basically the more early picks the better. Reasons obviously to accelerate our rebuild, but history shows you really need to nail yes nail three drafts totalling at least 6 guns. We need to be patient otherwise we could mess this up putting all our eggs in one basket.
We tried that , sorry i have to disagree . You go for super quality like Prestia and Lynch when you have a nucleus of young jets and not the other way round otherwise they become a waste. Our kids are basically average at best with no superstars. We need to be patient now as we've dug our own hole and why we've onl;y won two games. Sorry your method is the road to disaster as we don't have a minimum of 6 young jets and 6 A graders on our list, especially if we lose our three fastest, elite and best experienced players in Rioli, Baker and Bolton. We could be left with a lettuce patch full of snails.