quote author=bullus_hit link=topic=48882.msg1791828#msg1791828 date=1416046338]
Webb's scope is much higher, and yes I would take him ahead of Lonie, although my instincts tell me it will only be Lonie available at 52. If we want him then it has to be 33, that means we would have to weigh up missing out on a true inside mid like Gore or Miller, I'm favouring the inside mid at this stage.
[/quote]
I think Webb can be better long term then most available at 33. Gore & Miller are my hopes at 33. If they are gone and it's Bampton or Two Dads NB. I take Webb. If we get Weller and Webb we have added real polish. I wouldn't be unhappy with that.
Webb's scope is much higher, and yes I would take him ahead of Lonie, although my instincts tell me it will only be Lonie available at 52. If we want him then it has to be 33, that means we would have to weigh up missing out on a true inside mid like Gore or Miller, I'm favouring the inside mid at this stage.
[/quote]
I think Webb can be better long term then most available at 33. Gore & Miller are my hopes at 33. If they are gone and it's Bampton or Two Dads NB. I take Webb. If we get Weller and Webb we have added real polish. I wouldn't be unhappy with that.