Thats assuming we pick him.Mr Magic said:Wright's kicking is elite. He would be the best kick for goal we have had since the big O (donut man Ottens). Can't see him getting to 12, however, if he does then it will be champange all round.
Thats assuming we pick him.Mr Magic said:Wright's kicking is elite. He would be the best kick for goal we have had since the big O (donut man Ottens). Can't see him getting to 12, however, if he does then it will be champange all round.
bullus_hit said:One thing that's certain is talls like Peter Wright don't come around too often, we baulked at Grundy and that to me was a mistake, particularly given we were scrounging around for a ruckman last year and had to settled for our third preference. Peter Wright has the potential to be a major weapon, for starters he would be the tallest CHF in the league by quite some margin. At 203cm he could also be the perfect foil for Maric, at least until he builds up and assumes number one ruck duties himself.
Midway through the year he was being talked up as the number 1 pick, this was coming on the back of some monumental performances in the TAC. Against the Eastern Ranges he had 19 touches, 8 contested marks and kicked 10 goals, 1 behind. Two weeks later against NT he had 21 touches, kicked 7.5 and took 6 contested marks. The next week another 19 possessions, 7 contested marks and 7 goals.
Do I believe he can hold down CHF? I give him a 60/40 chance of succeeding, his one on one ability isn't as impressive as say McCartin but his style is also completely different. Much like Vickery he outstretches his opponents instead of out muscling them, as he gains strength he may even develop an extra string to his bow, this will make him a nightmare match-up. The beauty with Wright is he can also play in the ruck, I prefer him as a forward but then again I preferred Ottens as a forward too. Things can change pretty quickly in football and players can adapt to the circumstances.
Wright's stocks cannot dip below a top 20 pick IMO, if he struggles at CHF then he will be an able ruckman who will demand a first round pick in the event he gets traded. He would also provide some leverage if we decide to cut Vickery loose, I say it would be too good an opportunity to pass up.
Mr Magic said:Wright's kicking is elite. He would be the best kick for goal we have had since the big O (donut man Ottens). Can't see him getting to 12, however, if he does then it will be champange all round.
Gus said:As a comparison
Ahern 5M 1.13 10M 1.82 20M 3.02 Agility 7.92 Beep 14 6
Ellis 5M 1.18 10M 1.91 20M 3.15 Agility 8.21 Beep 14 1
Stylo said:Thought Ahern would be quicker than that, had his pace talked up by all and sundry this year. His repeat sprint is probably a better indication though.
I'm really hoping Ahern slides to us if not Wright or Weller.
bullus_hit said:His agility is great though, sometimes this creates the illusion of pace.
Stylo said:True. How do you rate him against the other pick 12 candidates?
amcre said:I agree if available we should take Wright and think we will, but if you think taking Grundy at 9 over Vlaustin would have been the better choice, then I am not so sure I trust your judgement.
Mr Magic said:Wright's kicking is elite. He would be the best kick for goal we have had since the big O (donut man Ottens). Can't see him getting to 12, however, if he does then it will be champange all round.
bullus_hit said:Very highly, would take him ahead of Duggan.
Letsroar said:Hey Bully Cockatoo, Wright and Ahern all available. Who do you pick and why
bullus_hit said:Wright definitely gets the gig, talls like this come around once every 4 years, structurally he also slots into our side given he's more of a forward than ruckman.
YinnarTiger said:Is he related to my original boyhood hero wearing no.2 for Richmond, Roy?
bullus_hit said:Don't think so, the more I watch him the more he reminds me of Daniel Jackson, although his disposal efficiency was 85% in the SANFL, something which Jacko struggled to achieve over his whole career. If he was available at 52 we would be mad not to consider him.
I was in a Coterie with Roy's son in the mid 2000s , pretty sure he wouldn't have son of drafting ageYinnarTiger said:Is he related to my original boyhood hero wearing no.2 for Richmond, Roy?