Col.W.Kurtz said:What do you read into Lennon's poor testing, anything?
bullus_hit said:No way if Lennon is on the board. Personally I think we should be grabbing a mid or utility, Jones is in the 20-30 bracket, a huge reach at 12.
Stylo said:People said similar about Conca. Was considered a second rounder for much of the year IIRC
Stylo said:People said similar about Conca. Was considered a second rounder for much of the year IIRC
If we think he's got midfield potential, which based on what I've seen he does, then I don't see why we wouldn't at least consider him. His attributes scream FJ. Goes hard, good kick, strong grab, defensively minded, great kid
Not sure we're that far into Lennon that we'd snap him up without checking out our options at least
bullus_hit said:It's made me reassess his midfield prospects, something which I had talked up after his blistering finish to the TAC season. But as far as an AFL career is concerned, I still think he'll be fine as a HBF or HFF. His sprint time was 3.18 which was ordinary but he still managed to finish in the top half for the repeat sprints. To be honest, it was one of the most peculiar set of results I can remember, his agility was in the bottom 4% which is reserved for lumbering ruckman, but there's been no hint of that on the field. I think once he builds up his tank he'll be fine, he blitzed with the skills testing so he's still in the top 2-3 kicks in the draft, and his marking is A grade. We definitely need a talented HFF and I wouldn't be putting all my eggs in the O'Hanlon basket, so Lennon makes perfect sense. In saying that, I'd still grab the best onballer available at that pick and Lewis Taylor seems to fit the bill. Unfortunately there's been no smoke where that's concerned.
Col.W.Kurtz said:It is a mystery how such a productive player can test like an arthritic sloth.
Good testing doesn’t make you a good player, but you can normally see field indications of how someone tests.
bullus_hit said:Most have been shocked by the results to be honest, Lennon has even cut his teeth against Collingwood's reserve side and has performed admirably. From the naked eye, he's plays quicker and his far more agile than his testing suggests. A bad day maybe? A niggle or two? I don't think we'll ever know the real story but I certainly wouldn't be crossing a line through his name.
Tigertool said:He was considered mid first round I thought? Freo were keen on him with pick 15 or so from memory.
Stylo said:Apparently it's been two years in a row now that he's tested this poorly. Bizarre really
Stylo said:People said similar about Conca. Was considered a second rounder for much of the year IIRC
If we think he's got midfield potential, which based on what I've seen he does, then I don't see why we wouldn't at least consider him. His attributes scream FJ. Goes hard, good kick, strong grab, defensively minded, great kid
Not sure we're that far into Lennon that we'd snap him up without checking out our options at least
Mr Magic said:Zac Jones or Zach Merrett both good chances to go at 12. Lennon may be the one to fall through from the top bracket and not convinced we'll take him.
DirtyDogTiger said:I'd hate to see diesels results - same with dunstall - plugger ; the jarmen amongst others
DirtyDogTiger said:I'd hate to see diesels results - same with dunstall - plugger ; the jarmen amongst others
Stylo said:good point, and considering he was able to rack up 37 possessions in a TAC cup game, with 15 handball receives... I just don't get it. Doesn't add up, unless BOTH times he's been at the combine he's had a niggle or been sick