Which I’ve done, many times. But you choose to laugh it off a irreleventPeople who are there or who have been there. Footage of actual events on the ground.
Not hard.
Which I’ve done, many times. But you choose to laugh it off a irreleventPeople who are there or who have been there. Footage of actual events on the ground.
Not hard.
I’ve already acknowledged that some Israeli ordnance was used in Hamas rockets. There were also components supplied to them by Iran, Syria etc.
Good post.I’m not going to go back and forward on this. The concept of the last straw comes back to an opinion and Palestinians would say their last straw was reached a long time ago.
Go to the idea of peace
Peace to Israelis and Palestinians cannot come from war becauee the outcome will not be accepted. Hamas will be replaced, resistance will continue.
There is a massive imbalance in power. Israel has one of the most highly resourced militaries in the world, Hamas had some rockets many of which were stitched together from unexplored Israeli rockets.
Peace can only come by Israel saying “we will live side by side with Palestinians” and getting UN backed peace keepers involved. Hamas and its successors can only be weakened by taking away their reason for existing. The powerful giving the weak the gift of peace is the only way to solve this.
Until Israel realises this they will be at perpetual war.
Not true at all. History and any fact finding or search engine will show time and time again the arabs were the first to break any accord or deal put into place.No Willo every time there is a peace deal Israel reneg. They keep on building settlements in the area designated for Palestinians as an example. Rockets are desperation. They have a government in the west bank that has stated Israel’s right to exist in 1993, the old PLO. The settlements continue, makes no difference.
There was a report that a lot of the Hamas rockets found are in fact Israeli rockets that didn’t work. I will see if I can find it, as much as 30-40% of the rockets found.
The flaw in this is that Israel was required to do something, the Palestinians were only required to live on their land.Not true at all. History and any fact finding or search engine will show time and time again the arabs were the first to break any accord or deal put into place.
From the Balfour Declaration, Churchills’ partition and founding of Jordan, the 1948 UN Resolution 50, The Camp David Accords,The Oslo Accords and many other peace plans.
What was the common denominator when these plans all failed?
Terrorist or State based players initiating attacks on Israel. Now I know some will say the attacks occurred because of delays and perceived transgressions by Israel. But for peace to work it takes two parties to agree and then implement the agreement.
Firstly Iranians are not Arabs, they are PersiansOff on a tangent a bit.
There is an inherent problem with many arabs. They just can hardly live together, let alone live with another country they hate.
Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Iran, Yemen, Sudan just to give some examples.
The warlords want to rule, tribal feuds going back decades, different tribes in the same country, different sects of the same religion, it doesn’t matter. They must just love the mayhem.
Israel isn’t involved there but they all have something in common.
<snip>
Off on a tangent a bit.
There is an inherent problem with many arabs. They just can hardly live together, let alone live with another country they hate.
Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Iran, Yemen, Sudan just to give some examples.
The warlords want to rule, tribal feuds going back decades, different tribes in the same country, different sects of the same religion, it doesn’t matter. They must just love the mayhem.
Israel isn’t involved there but they all have something in common.
Not all Iranians are Persians. The majority are, but there is quite a mix of ethnicities there. Including Arabs.Firstly Iranians are not Arabs, they are Persians
Yes they can’t live together like Anglo celts in Ireland, people from the balkans, Slavic people from Russia and Ukraine, the basques and the Spanish etc have not been able to live together in history as well. There are disputes everywhere, it is not unique to Arabs.
Interestingly in the 1950s what was the thing that brought them together and had them fighting side by side ? The NAQBA and the dispossession of the Palestinian people.
The other thing is what does that area of the African continent have in common with each other including Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria , Libya, Sudan, Egypt, Yemen and of course Palestine as well as others. European colonialism.
I think weve already covered this ground. Apart from purchased land in the WB, they shouldn’t be building any settlements they’ve no right to. They wouldn’t need to blockade Gaza if terrorists didn’t use it as a base of operations. National security. Exactly the same as Egypt having walls and checkpoints on their border with Gaza.The flaw in this is that Israel was required to do something, the Palestinians were only required to live on their land.
Israel was required to do 3 things. Stop building settlements in the West Bank, share sovereignty over East Jerusalem with the Palestinians and stop blockading Gaza.
They never had any intention of doing any of them and they knew that complete control over militants would be impossible for the Palestinians to do so they did nothing and waited for someone to lob a missile over the fence and then blame the Palestinians
We have. I have decided not to respond to your posts. Not because I can’t but because there is no point.I think weve already covered this ground.
Yes you are correct, there are many disputes all over the world. But not with the same intensity, frequency and total disregard for their own people. Usually it was against a common foe. Not their own people. There maybe some exceptions though.
Willow keep posting as Sin aint the only dude on this site.We have. I have decided not to respond to your posts. Not because I can’t but because there is no point.
Yes you are correct, there are many disputes all over the world. But not with the same intensity, frequency and total disregard for their own people.
And the Balkans were what? Between Serbs, Bosnians, Croats. It seems you missed the pointNot with the same intensity or total disregard for their own? Maybe some exceptions? The Balkans war in the 1990s (there have been a few of them so we need to date them) was more brutal than anything we've seen in the middle east. By some margin. Pretty sure the Balkans are whiteys, unless that term is only being reserved for those those of Anglo Saxon descent.
Follow the point and you wouldn’t have to *smile* yourselfF**ck me this laughable.
I think the intensity of the first and second world wars which were disputes amongst countries of the west were pretty intense, I'd even say more intense than the disputes in the middle east.
DS
They pick something out, respond then take off as usual.Willow keep posting as Sin aint the only dude on this site.