Sintiger said:I have always liked him as a potential midfielder because he has the frame to play inside.
That's the thing, with them chasing Moore & Townsend we have a top 10 pick inside mid type already with Nick
Sintiger said:I have always liked him as a potential midfielder because he has the frame to play inside.
Moore and Townsend were major fails.... I hope we didn't give up draft picks for them. Nick showed some signs in the guts, could become a handy contested ball winner and allow Cotch to get a bit more outside ball.French Tiger said:That's the thing, with them chasing Moore & Townsend we have a top 10 pick inside mid type already with Nick
SCOOP said:No, he didn't come as a elite midfielder. He was a back flanker who had runs on the ball. Never a big ball winner. Never a great runner.
It's the case of Richmond trying to yet again, manufacture midfielders instead of taking them.
Friday was a great sign, there is a skill set to work with but it's a long way to go before he is a midfielder.
bullus_hit said:Nick Vlastuin - I must admit that Vlastuin has been oscillating up and down my rankings for some time. In the end, I've placed him behind Macrae and Mayes on the grounds that he hasn't yet convinced me that he'll be the huge ball winning machine that we so obviously need in middle. At the moment, I primarily see him on a back flank where his neat and composed disposal will be used to great effect, along with his fierce attack on both the player and ball. In short, he's a tackling machine and with his sizable frame, should go on to intimidate and unsettle many unsuspecting forwards at AFL level.
The big issue with Vlastuin comes down to his ability to get his hands on the ball enough, despite being listed in the best players for Northern Knights on 8 occasions, he only managed to pass the 20 possession mark twice in 10 games. In some ways his tackle count has gone some way to compensating for the low disposal numbers, with an average of 6 tackles a game, it is definitely a feature of his game that I would consider to be elite.
SCOOP said:No, he didn't come as a elite midfielder. He was a back flanker who had runs on the ball. Never a big ball winner. Never a great runner.
It's the case of Richmond trying to yet again, manufacture midfielders instead of taking them.
Friday was a great sign, there is a skill set to work with but it's a long way to go before he is a midfielder.
SCOOP said:No, he didn't come as a elite midfielder. He was a back flanker who had runs on the ball. Never a big ball winner. Never a great runner.
K3 said:Can't agree Scoop. Based on my dodgy memory Nick was a midfielder who was played back, later in his last TAC season, due to injury, as they didn't want him getting crunched. I am happy to be proven wrong, but that's what the ol' grey matter is letting me know.
K3 said:Can't agree Scoop. Based on my dodgy memory Nick was a midfielder who was played back, later in his last TAC season, due to injury, as they didn't want him getting crunched. I am happy to be proven wrong, but that's what the ol' grey matter is letting me know.
artball said:he may not have come to this club in their mind as a mid, but that's where he played as a junior at Eltham. pretty sure he captained the Vic Metro side from that position as well ?
yr memory isn't dodgy K3
K3 said:Can't agree Scoop. Based on my dodgy memory Nick was a midfielder who was played back, later in his last TAC season, due to injury, as they didn't want him getting crunched. I am happy to be proven wrong, but that's what the ol' grey matter is letting me know.
SCOOP said:The other way around. He did dabble in the midfield but mainly as a back flanker. As Bully showed, he never won big numbers at TAC level.
artball said:he may not have come to this club in their mind as a mid, but that's where he played as a junior at Eltham. pretty sure he captained the Vic Metro side from that position as well ?
tigerlove said:Well Bully is wrong. As mentioned he had 30 and 27 disposals in 2 of his last 4 games. No coincidence that he played more midfield in those games.
http://www.foxsportspulse.com/team_info.cgi?action=PSTATS&pID=192116736&client=1-3020-111703-206344-16804346
SCOOP said:Naw he's not. To win big possies in only 2 games, shows that he wasn't a big ball winner in the other eight.
Therefore not a mid. Or if we did draft him as a mid, we drafted a mid who couldn't win it that much. That's worse.
tigerlove said:Yes he is wrong, and you are too. You said he was NEVER a big ball winner. Fact is he showed he can be a big ball winner as the did in some of his last few games where he actually played more midfield time. As others have mentioned he was a midfielder in his junior days and only reason he was playing half back was he was coming off injuries prior to 2012 season, had a particularly bad ankle injury.
Leysy Days said:Hallelujah at last Supercoach has listened.
Two years too late but at last playing Nick where he is suited and the team needs him most.
Dont back down now Dimmer
SCOOP said:This will be the question, will Dimma keep rolling him through. I liked it when he started in the square. Statement of intent.
tigerlove said:Well Bully is wrong. As mentioned he had 30 and 27 disposals in 2 of his last 4 games. No coincidence that he played more midfield in those games.
http://www.foxsportspulse.com/team_info.cgi?action=PSTATS&pID=192116736&client=1-3020-111703-206344-16804346
bullus_hit said:Don't see how I'm wrong, he passed the 20 possession mark twice in 10 games, you have listed the two occasions he managed that feat. In the end he still hasn't managed to rake in big numbers at AFL level. I hope he builds the tank because his clearance work is decent, the major factor will be building up the endurance, this is still a work in progress however.
tigerlove said:PS I agree with you, his endurance is the key to becoming a permanent midfielder, not sure he has that.