While I certainly don't think our pick 9 in the 2012 draft is a bust, I think we pretty much have what we expected to get when we drafted flossy. A good hard working, role player that comfortably sits in our second tier. Never going to be an A grade star in the midfield, key knock on him in his jr days was he was never a high possession getter as he never had the tank, but a good honest foot solider.
Makes me wonder given how bad our ruck stocks are at the moment, and seeing how well Grundy is developing with amazing upside (gave Hammer an absolute bath last night), makes me think if we had our time again how whether we should have been braver and drafted him instead. I know it would have been a risk drafting a ruckman (and a lot of other clubs passed on him too), but our drafting of Nick has pretty much been our typical recruitment approach the past few years....i.e. draft a safe foot solider who will likely play a solid 200 games, however has zero x factor.