-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Nankervis !!
- Thread starter Tigaman
- Start date
Baloo said:
If he's going to play as badly as he does, he need to be 1st in the AFL for hitouts.
Even then, I wouldn't play him.
I suspect this argument will be a moot one not long into next season. Hampson somehow managed to stay out on the park for a full season, more or less, without sustaining a serious injury for the first time in his career. If he stays fit for two seasons in a row it will be a miracle.
Nankervis has a gilt-edged opportunity here.
Nankervis has a gilt-edged opportunity here.
TOT70 said:
Yep, I get the same macabre jollies.
Hammer does get good air. You will see him soar and basically able to pick his spot. It's at this point you realise he has a few tigers clear in one direction and Hammer just plonks it in the other direction often straight down the opponents throat.
As Harry Who used to say. Amazin'
E
easy_tiger
Guest
tigersnake said:
I'll respect the collective decision, but Im gonna stick with Nankers.
Im excited about this bloke. Was speaking to a swan on friday night was a bit dumbfounded at his departure.
his age gives us something that Elbows Stafford, Strawbs, Simmo, Evarn and Hammer could never give.
Like your mum driving her thumb all the way to the sole under the toe of new school shoes when your 14.
lamb22 said:
Once again confusing yourself with the RFC selection team. Then a statistical correlation between two different rucks playing at widely different levels as if the No.1 ruckman explained their results totally. How you fool people with errant nonsense like this really amuses me. So your logical extension must surely be to have kept playing Maric at AFL instead of Hampson? Then we would have won many more games. So why did we even need to obtain Nankervis? We have Eevan still.
But it hasn't occurred to you that Hampson and Nank could possibly play together? Like Nankervis was often the solo or No.1 ruck at the Swans, right? That as a 22 year old, he is still learning his craft and needs more experience, but hopefully will carry the ruck at RFC in the future years. That it may place Griffiths' role under pressure too, although I'm hoping he will get to play far more as a KPF. But if he doesn't find consistency, that a Hampson/Nankervis combination may play and no Griff, or to match certain opponents?
So whose the goat?
