:hihi very good old boy,but tell me who do's FJ prefer maybe he likes another an he has final say mmmmmm very intresting
CC TIGER said:How delayed is the draft telecast ;D
In the que Sunshine an no I will not be having a drink with you the night before..........I know your typeMissing33 said:CC TIGER said:How delayed is the draft telecast ;D
You'll probably have a few golf lessons on that day mate.......if you need a stand in let me know. ;D
CC TIGER said:In the que Sunshine an no I will not be having a drink with you the night before..........I know your typeMissing33 said:CC TIGER said:How delayed is the draft telecast ;D
You'll probably have a few golf lessons on that day mate.......if you need a stand in let me know. ;D
taraba said:Yes but you generally don't have to use ridiculously high draft picks to get those types either. Go for pure talent with pick 2 say, Cotchin or Morton and then use picks 18 and 19 on maybe a Selwood/Veszpremi/Ward and Gaertner/Simpson/Gourdis. That's unless we trade pick 19 and a player to upgarde to another first rounder which would be awesome.Tango said:that means moreton is your athletic utility, a bit like andrew embley
this type of player is an icing on the cake type which works well with the eagles because they have cox, judd, kerr, cousins.....
what we need is the flour in the middle, the substance that allows the icing to stick
we need a hard nose big bodied mid who wins his own ball, tackles, chases and blocks and stands up under pressure - he protects and brings players like lids, foley & tambo into the game.
im not sure who that player is in the draft but thats what we need
Next year we go for a Naitanui/Yarran/Rich/Suban combo with our early picks and suddenly the house is looking a lot tidier
A bit of common sense in this thinking, you can pick the hard nuts later in the draft and also the rookie draft, remember Foley and King were rookies, Mitchell was a rookie, so the adage about drafting class early is the right approach.
My preferance for our first pick is Morton as he is a Rolls Royce, those that are saying he cant get his own ball perhaps dont watch him closely enough, this kid just has a huge motor and sensational skills. Just ask the kids who played on him during the recent carnival they will tell you.
Having said all of that I don't mind Cotchin either but if given a choice would take Morton then draft some hard nut mids and good talls.
Anyway thats my two bobs worth.
tigers#7 said:Lookiing more likely that Cale will be a Tiger next year!
Thats what im saying, no doubt we'll overlook Cale now. HMmmm im a bit disappointed because I had my heart set on Cotchin, but, Cale dosnt sound too shabby at allskiptomystu said:tigers#7 said:Lookiing more likely that Cale will be a Tiger next year!
Looks like it with Mitch signalling his intentions that he wants to be a Tiger!
TT33 said:Can someone remind me of these guys vital stats. EG: Height, weight, strengths, weaknesses etc.
I mean it's no good getting excited if they are a way off playing seniors in the near future. Or if they are anywhere being claws favourite "D" words.
Thats pencil thin, looking at the Coburg lists in the sat hun it puts him 1cm taller than and eleven kilos lighter than Mcguane or 1cm shorter than Schulz and twenty kilos lighter.checkside said:TT33 said:Can someone remind me of these guys vital stats. EG: Height, weight, strengths, weaknesses etc.
I mean it's no good getting excited if they are a way off playing seniors in the near future. Or if they are anywhere being claws favourite "D" words.
Cale Morton
192cms
75kgs
JON boy is listed in the hun at 188 cm and 91 kg, Dan Jackson is listed at 187 cm and 90 kg.hptiger said:JON anyone WA boy pencil thin still is pencil thin, Cotchin all the way. We need to draft body types not just heights.