As someone who liked CCJ and thought the club should have done more to keep him, I think we’ll be happy with the early second round pick. Good chance he plays a fair bit of VFL this year on $500,000 a year.
-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Matthew Clarke
- Thread starter Harry
- Start date
As someone who liked CCJ and thought the club should have done more to keep him, I think we’ll be happy with the early second round pick. Good chance he plays a fair bit of VFL this year on $500,000 a year.
What I couldn't work out with the Higgins selection at 17 was, we had just won the premiership with Butler, Rioli, Castagna and Caddy. He was considered to be predominately a small forward, I just didn't see the need.
We were winning preeemierships, SA. And some of the drafts were thin. As for pick 17 that year, help yourself -
This site is really helpful @Dyer'ere for looking at drafts easily
www.draftguru.com.au
2017 AFL Draft and Trade Period - Draftguru
www.draftguru.com.au
We got refunds on Higgins and CJ, St Kevin. Good times. But how often will Blair pick up after Clarke?
CJ is one I see as not profiling AFL. At draft time and now.
Last edited:
CJ makes sense when you think about our 2017 rucks. We didn’t expect Soldo to come on so strong. North suck the talent out of all their players
You’re correct about the refunds. I’ve defending Clarke a bit as I think sometimes he has been hamstrung by our success but 2017 sticks out badly in hindsight.
There is always a need for very good footballers, tigerman. Not many would take a pudgy 5'3" can't kick at 17. El Regardless of what position he plays.
Clarke didn't fail because he took a small forward. He failed because he took a zero AFL profile battler.
Not sure I can agree with this.
Higgins profiled as the highest ranked footballer in the entire U/18 national ranks. Football I.Q off the charts and was racking up decent numbers for us before his brain injury.
He’s obviously never been quick but does posses very good endurance and after years of running training with guru Bohdan Babachek, has become a very efficient runner.
As mentioned, he lacks a yard of pace, has never seemingly recovered from his serious brain operation and most importantly was the wrong positional player at the time for our list requirements.
But saying he had no footballing profiles would be like declaring that Jade Gresham had less as Higgins was a similar but more decorated junior.
If we talking mids then the cupboard is bare. We opted for Balta and CCJ. Taylor the obvious stuff up.
Refunds are fine but it pushes the return down the road.
We need 2017 picks to be top ten players if we are to win flags in 2022.
Hindsight is easy people. 17 a bust? Fruitcake city. We won the flag! by definition the draft was the most difficult for us. Us. We got Balta. In our mitt. He's in the side. Walk up start. That means we won the draft, statistically, objectively. I'll say it again, statistically, objectively.
But thats not all folks, we got Higgins who we got evens for on a trade, and regardless of what you think of him, is still playing seniors. Ditto CCJ.
It ain't the vibe, its data dummy. We remain ahead of the curve.
Ridiculous.
But thats not all folks, we got Higgins who we got evens for on a trade, and regardless of what you think of him, is still playing seniors. Ditto CCJ.
It ain't the vibe, its data dummy. We remain ahead of the curve.
Ridiculous.
In hindsight.
But at the time we had exceptionally good tall defender stocks. Rance, Grimes, Astbury and then drafted Balta before him.
Not hard to see why we didn't taker Taylor really.
