Matt white | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Matt white

Ghost of 29 said:
No. Hanging on to Schulz, trading for McMuffin, Hislop, recruiting Kingsley et al..that is what has cost TW his job and held the club back. I will contest that Matty is an integral part of the team. This doesn't mean he has to be in the top 5 players, it means he plays an important role as part of the 22.

Does he have some weaknesses - of course, but he is one kid who would work his ringer off to improve this area.

But he brings a lot to the team in terms of run, breaking the lines, agression at the contest and working for team mates.

So if you think delisting Matty will help the club, then it is you that has rocks in your head my friend.

Read 2 messages up at my 2nd last post...never said delist him, read what I write.
 
rosy23 said:
Can't people discuss things without the personal insults?

Fact is Matty is selected each week by the coaching panel. They'd have more insight the role he plays and must see something in him. When he has been sent back to Coburg he's worked hard on his deficiencies and almost always put in a BOG performance. The kid works hard and listens. I reckon he's got a lot of improvemernt in him still. He's far from our worst player but a bit of support might even help make him an even better one. ;)

Fair call...good luck to the guy
 
yeah that hammy is going to hold him back assuming Cog's takes his spot back in the side. Matty white gives it his all and is bloody quick but unfortunatly doesn't really have the skill to carry us forward. He is a depth player and nothing more.
 
rosy23 said:
Can't people discuss things without the personal insults?

Fact is Matty is selected each week by the coaching panel. They'd have more insight the role he plays and must see something in him. When he has been sent back to Coburg he's worked hard on his deficiencies and almost always put in a BOG performance. The kid works hard and listens. I reckon he's got a lot of improvemernt in him still. He's far from our worst player but a bit of support might even help make him an even better one. ;)

That's all true Rosy. But the deficiencies in his game suggest his best may not be good enough to bring us the ultimate prize.
 
trade him! you could trade him off and get a pick around the 30-40 mark, not bad for a useless brainless footballer. he looks like barney rubble in a rfc jumper.
 
Tiger_4_Life said:
Read 2 messages up at my 2nd last post...never said delist him, read what I write.

Fair enough.

Look, I agree with your general premise that unskilled players will hold us back. But don't agree that Matt is that unskilled that he will be one of those.

There are 10 players who you would flick before you even considered Matt.
 
zippadeee said:
trade him! you could trade him off and get a pick around the 30-40 mark, not bad for a useless brainless footballer. he looks like barney rubble in a rfc jumper.

Ahh some supporters. Unfortunately you're one of ours. :flush
 
Sorry, gotta stick up for Player White.

What do I like? Pace. Hard running. Hard tackling - bit of mongrel there.

Things do not always come off but I reckon youse are too hard on his disposals. And on his thinking.

He stiill has some upside in my view and at best he could be very good. He is a dangerous man.
 
Ghost of 29 said:
No. Hanging on to Schulz, trading for McMuffin, Hislop, recruiting Kingsley et al..that is what has cost TW his job and held the club back. I will contest that Matty is an integral part of the team. This doesn't mean he has to be in the top 5 players, it means he plays an important role as part of the 22.

Does he have some weaknesses - of course, but he is one kid who would work his ringer off to improve this area.

But he brings a lot to the team in terms of run, breaking the lines, agression at the contest and working for team mates.

So if you think delisting Matty will help the club, then it is you that has rocks in your head my friend.
ill ignore the inane feral on this thread but will answer this.

its because players like matt white are an integral part of the team we will finish bottom 2. we have too many like him at the club.
yeah he has attributes that are admirable but they dont outweigh his deficiencies. yep he has a dip and theres lots on the list who dont but because he has a dip do we keep him.

for me the worst two traits just doesnt get enough of the ball and his kicking skills are atrocious. i consider him almost the worst kick in the team.
 
U2Tigers said:
White is still best 22 - I won't even argue with anyone over that.

Some poeople think only 5-6 players make a team on here.
yep hes best 22 its why we are a laughing stock and near the bottom of the ladder.
 
Tiger_4_Life said:
Read 2 messages up at my 2nd last post...never said delist him, read what I write.
i will say it for ya delist him at the end of 2010.
 
the claw said:
his kicking skills are atrocious. i consider him almost the worst kick in the team.

his kicking is ordinary but edwards is surely the worst kick when in the 22, mcguane 2nd, coughlan 3rd, thursty 4th, id put matt white and foley for equal 5th & 6th but matt white isnt actually a bad kick for goal on a short bust run but his field kicking is pusssssss.
 
SkunkDen said:
his kicking is ordinary but edwards is surely the worst kick when in the 22, mcguane 2nd, coughlan 3rd, thursty 4th, id put matt white and foley for equal 5th & 6th but matt white isnt actually a bad kick for goal on a short bust run but his field kicking is pusssssss.

Edwards kicking has improved in leaps and bounds at Coburg, he's a better kick than White.
 
IanG said:
Edwards kicking has improved in leaps and bounds at Coburg, he's a better kick than White.

I'm sure Matty also looks better at Coburg where there is less pressure and intensity. He has a very reasonable effieciency rating (haven't checked lately but I think it's in the 80s) and is not known for multiple clangers. Surely those stats show he's not quite as bad as some are making out. It was the same with Andy Kellaway's kicking constantly being criticised more due to his name than his actual performance. Added to that someone posted that Matt's been playing with an ankle injury, and I know we have at least one other player on here copping a bagging for his kicking when he really should be rested rather than jabbed.
 
SkunkDen said:
his kicking is ordinary but edwards is surely the worst kick when in the 22, mcguane 2nd, coughlan 3rd, thursty 4th, id put matt white and foley for equal 5th & 6th but matt white isnt actually a bad kick for goal on a short bust run but his field kicking is pusssssss.

I'd put Tucky ahead of near all of those names.