Chiang Mai Tiger said:Sure wish betting on the AFL wasn't such a powerful and influential monster it is.
Stylo said:I reckon they've earned that advantage by winning more games than any other club this year. Fair play to me.
Good point. It does have side effects and that's one.Panthera tigris FC said:Exactly right. Cart before the horse. They aren't doing it to influence betting markets. There is a strategic advantage in it for them. One they've earned by securing the minor premiership a week early.
Ice said:no issue with it
hope Norf go with the B Team as well
Sintiger said:My concern is that the only reason people don't care is because they are playing a team out of contention. How would we feel if they were playing Sydney this weekend and we needed them to win for a top 4 spot.
Can't pick and choose. I reckon it shouldn't be allowed
I agree but there must be a way otherwise why would Freo ask permission? They would have just gone and done it.rosy23 said:How could you regulate it? A limited number of changes each week wouldn't work. Dunno.
MurrayValleyTiger said:Would love it if we had this luxury!
great , thanksIce said:The amended rule, No. 29, 'To Perform on One's Merits', reads: "(It) means at all times to perform honestly and to the best of one's ability in the pursuit only of legitimate competitive objectives.
"For the avoidance of doubt "legitimate competitive objective" includes the development of the team or players or management of player fatigue or injuries but does not include improving a club’s draft position, improving a club's position with respect to a potential player exchange or manipulating a club's position on the ladder for the purpose of improving its draw within the finals series."
So Freo resting players has no impact on finals therefore OK.
However, North resting will improve its draw (maybe) so would not be OK. But if they are fatigued or injured, no problem.