Anyone can see it a mile off. If anything he should be played once or twice a month depending on match ups. He is not capable of consistency. If not this, get the hell rid of him
Tigers of Old said:Still think we should sign him up again.
Leysy Days said:Depends which week it is for Tooheys answer. ;D
Tigers of Old said:That's a fair comment however I don't see a lot wrong with fluctuating positions on players. They go up they go down. Think it's more folly to hold a stubborn position.
Luke was good last week. Poor this week. So be it.
spook said:Should have played Aadwards or McBean, and will next week.
Leysy Days said:Wanting him signed to another contract then marking him as dropped inside a week is some fluctuating position mate.
He's been with us long enough to go on his whole body of work & he simply doesnt impact games enough to persist with. Especially at his age with players in his role performing beneath him.
As for stubborn positions. Leysy agrees. He's even though about changing his avatar for a second or so this year. ;D
TigerForce said:If we tried McDonough, we might as well get Elton or O'Hanlon in next week. What do we try out? Debutants??
DirtyDogTiger said:Better not play O'Hanlon
TigerForce said:Unless he's injured, why not?