Time to end the farce .Ceglar for the Hawk's 204 cm 90 kg ,didn't get pushed around last week ,and he doesn't have smart's of the BEAN .
69 vintage said:Time to end the farce .Ceglar for the Hawk's 204 cm 90 kg ,didn't get pushed around last week ,and he doesn't have smart's of the BEAN .
Tigers of Old said:Disagree. I thought we smashed Ceglar. Give McBean a game against GWS.
Tigers of Old said:Disagree. I thought we smashed Ceglar. Give McBean a game against GWS.
Biggy said:I'm not getting excited about McBean one bit until I see him in the firsts. We don't have the best track record of developing talls and I'm certainly not getting my hopes up. He needs a lot more size before he can even be considered IMO.
Biggy said:I'm not getting excited about McBean one bit until I see him in the firsts. We don't have the best track record of developing talls and I'm certainly not getting my hopes up. He needs a lot more size before he can even be considered IMO.
D85 said:If Vickery wasnt going to play I reckon they wouldda played the Bean Counter
Wouldn't mind giving jack a week off to freshen up against gws but pretty sure he will wanna try and kick 12 and win the ColemanBarnzy said:Would've played him this week. Don't think Brisbane will trouble us and his matchup would've likely been that young kid Clarke who's 88kg and played 10 odd games.
At least against GWS...
Looking forward to the two tall trios
Riewoldt
Vickery
McBean
Rance
Chaplin
Grimes
Barnzy said:Would've played him this week. Don't think Brisbane will trouble us and his matchup would've likely been that young kid Clarke who's 88kg and played 10 odd games.
At least against GWS...
Looking forward to the two tall trios
Riewoldt
Vickery
McBean
Rance
Chaplin
Grimes