Baron Samedi said:point is that mcbean deserves a spot more than Vickery.
apparently not according to Rosy.
Don't put words in my mouth. I'm happy for the coaches/selection panel to make the decisions.
Baron Samedi said:point is that mcbean deserves a spot more than Vickery.
apparently not according to Rosy.
rosy3 said:Don't put words in my mouth. I'm happy for the coaches/selection panel to make the decisions.
jb03 said:McBean's claim to fame on PRE is that he is becoming the only player selected to play seniors that Brodders has ever criticized
thejinx said:Rosy, you're not in any way related to Vickery are you?
lol sorry I couldn't help myself :-X
thejinx said:Rosy, you're not in any way related to Vickery are you?
lol sorry I couldn't help myself :-X
rosy3 said:Actually to show you're not just trolling it would be good if you could show any posts where I've shown any fondness for Ty or praise for how good a player he is.
yep.rosy3 said:Actually to show you're not just trolling it would be good if you could show any posts where I've shown any fondness for Ty or praise for how good a player he is.
caesar said:Liam got to about 8 contested mark opportunities, took none!
Sintiger said:yep.
I have said it before that McBean shows many of the traits that so many lambast Vickery for. He just refuses or can't impose himself on a game. Lurks around contests and doesn't work hard enough.
All he had to do was read his vfl coaches reports for years now to know this was the issue but I assume he has been told it as well.
Tigers of Old said:This was not a huge surprise.
Tigers of Old said:This was not a huge surprise.
tigerlove said:One has played 117 games, the other 5. Vickery should be offloaded at the end of the season, should have been offloaded 2 years ago. McBean needs to be given an extensive go at AFL level and if he can't prove himself then flick him off as well. If the club has always believed McBean lurks around contests and doesn't work hard enough why keep him on for 4 years? Tigers do this way too much. Keep players on the VFL list for far too long without giving them a decent go at AFL level. Why?
tigerlove said:http://www.foxsportspulse.com/round_info.cgi?a=MATCH&fixture=124569793&c=1-118-0-392693-0&pool=1
Imagine if McBean did take all those contested marks he missed, would have had 11 for the game instead of 3. He took the most contested marks in the game.
Brodders17 said:perhaps they think with maturity and size he will improve?
if they both don't work hard enough it's a reason to give neither a game not to promote McBean. Two wrongs don't make a right.tigerlove said:One has played 117 games, the other 5. Vickery should be offloaded at the end of the season, should have been offloaded 2 years ago. McBean needs to be given an extensive go at AFL level and if he can't prove himself then flick him off as well. If the club has always believed McBean lurks around contests and doesn't work hard enough why keep him on for 4 years? Tigers do this way too much. Keep players on the VFL list for far too long without giving them a decent go at AFL level. Why?