Should't take a lot to usurp TV on recent years form/competitiveness.
Especially with Griff able to provide ruck relief now.
Especially with Griff able to provide ruck relief now.
Probably right but he still has to do it and he hasn't yetLeysy Days said:Should't take a lot to usurp TV on recent years form/competitiveness.
Especially with Griff able to provide ruck relief now.
Sintiger said:nah
He doesn't play at Sydney because Buddy, Tippett and Reid are ahead of him
He doesn't play at Hawthorn because Roughead, Hale and Gunston are ahead of him
He doesn't play at Richmond because Jack, Vickery and Griffiths are ahead of him. It's his job to get ahead of them through performance
Assumptions with the key word in there being could.Carter said:An overly simplistic view.
You're assuming that McBean could not replicate Reid's senior numbers at Sydney.
I reckon Sydney would take McBean over Reid in a heartbeat.
Gunston? What if McBean could be Gunston but over 200cm?
Too many fans look at age and games played and assume McBean must be behind our incumbents.
What if he wasn't behind Vickery and Griffiths? Just unacceptably attacking?
Sintiger said:Assumptions with the key word in there being could.
All I am asking if for McBean to show on the field that his potential is real. He has a great bag of tricks and now he has to knock the door down.
He isn't ready yet imo. When he is and shows it I will become his greatest fan.
Sintiger said:Assumptions with the key word in there being could.
All I am asking if for McBean to show on the field that his potential is real. He has a great bag of tricks and now he has to knock the door down.
He isn't ready yet imo. When he is and shows it I will become his greatest fan.
I don't drink anyone's Kool aid lamby. I call it as I see it.lamb22 said:I think you've drunk too much of the RFC coolaid Sin.
What exactly does Liam have to do. He goes at over 2.5 goals a game. I love Jack who goes at 2.43 goals a game (381 from 157)
He has shown more as a forward at VFL level than Griff, Astbury, Elton or Ty ever have.
Your theory seems to be Beanie kicking 150 at VFL level and Morris and Ty stinking up the firsts. I'm sure we'll benefit from that strategy!
Sintiger said:not just a giant flanker.
Sintiger said:Have a look what I have posted on McBean since mid last year and you will see I have been totally consistent. Learn how to get to contests, build a tank, take a few grabs, become a double threat and not just a giant flanker.
Juffaricho said:Just out of curiosity...
Our first 4 games are against Carlton, Western Bulldogs, Brisbane and Melbourne.
If you played Beanie on a flank, who are the opposition players that would get him.
Mackie in Rd. 5 would probably torch him on the rebound as he has enough height and good body use to nullify him but I can't think of the other teams matchup.
Robert Murphy would not play on him as they would use him in an attacking role so who else back there has height ?
Carlton are extremely average down back and now that Bootsma is gone who is the next 3rd/4th tall squib?
Brisbane have lost Adcock so the depth charts all get bumped up one so there are question marks there as well.
I can't see a Jack, Ty, Beanie forward line working but I could see a Jack, Griff, Beanie forward line offering different skill sets.
It would be interesting to see that threesome at some point in the pre-season to see how they each work.
What the hell was he doing whilst he was injured? Should have been bulking up, cause he will get smashed as a target week in, week out.Tigerflag2008 said:I'm not sure he has been held back in his first 2 years, no doubt he was on the verge in his first year but he got injured. It took him half of 2014 to recover from his injury and start to show glimpses of his first year form. By the end of the year, the seniors were on a roll and it was not the time to blood a colt.
A strong first month and he will be knocking on the door.
Juffaricho said:Just out of curiosity...
Our first 4 games are against Carlton, Western Bulldogs, Brisbane and Melbourne.
If you played Beanie on a flank, who are the opposition players that would get him.
Mackie in Rd. 5 would probably torch him on the rebound as he has enough height and good body use to nullify him but I can't think of the other teams matchup.
Robert Murphy would not play on him as they would use him in an attacking role so who else back there has height ?
Carlton are extremely average down back and now that Bootsma is gone who is the next 3rd/4th tall squib?
Brisbane have lost Adcock so the depth charts all get bumped up one so there are question marks there as well.
I can't see a Jack, Ty, Beanie forward line working but I could see a Jack, Griff, Beanie forward line offering different skill sets.
It would be interesting to see that threesome at some point in the pre-season to see how they each work.
spook said:Fair enough. I have a good third-hand source that says he will ask for a trade if he doesn't get a game. ...
Coburgtiger said:I think the thing you're missing ToO, is that, yes the kick was muffed, but because of where he chose to put it, it was a percentage option.
Sometimes you can mung punt a kick, but if you're putting it into a dangerous area, it doesn't matter so much. McBean identified the dangerous area (one of his greatest assets), and got the ball there ASAP.
He was annoyed with himself for scrapping it, because he expects better. But his instinct makes us dangerous.
Tigers of Old said:On that we can agree that he at least put it into the danger zone. After that it becomes chaos ball, we got lucky on this occasion. Obviously a more accurate kick gives you a higher percentage result. Anyways I want to see what he's got in the seniors this year so we can at least start assessing his performance at AFL level and not endlessly hypothesise.