-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Justice?
- Thread starter Legends of 2017
- Start date
Probably the most interest point about this little quirk of yours Livers is that Chelsea used exactly the same incorrect phrasing. Remarkable.
antman said:
This has led to the joke:
"The weather in England is a bit like the Middle East - it's either sunni or it's shiate."
:blah
Disco08 said:
Not that remarkable considering there are hundreds, if not thousands, of people on the internet who (mistakenly?) use this term. An handful of examples:
http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/islams.html
http://www.counterpunch.org/saidattacks.html
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081206211142AAGRA3F
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081207215334AAIDAMq
http://repositories.cdlib.org/ies/ciip/CIIP_4/
http://forums.opendemocracy.net/who_do_islams_worship_0
http://www.deccanherald.com/CONTENT/Dec292007/foreign2007122843545.asp
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/crisis/said.htm
http://volokh.com/posts/1141841124.shtml
revver.com/video/1074805/obsession-radical-islams-war-against-the-west/
http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/islam/T8422SF9GTSJIQN6G
So not that remarkable as you claim.
Thought you were onto something there, didn't you? :spin :hihi
lol, whatever you reckon mate.
Same IP address as Livers - check
Football related username, just like Livers - check
Agrees with everything Livers says - check
First post just happened to be agreeing with Livers - check
Hasn't posted since people brought up the possibility this might be Livers in disguise - check
Writes in a style very similar to Livers - check
Makes the same quirky errors as Livers - check
:spin
BTW - Link 1 no one makes the mistake, they just point out that it is a mistake. 2, they use the word Islams as an indication of more than one Islamic religion, not to describe adherents of the faith. 3, they just forget to use the possessive apostrophe, ie Islam's. 4, that's a question asked 16 hours. Not you is it? 5, describes multiple version of Islam. 6, fair enough. 7, see 3. 8, see 2. 9, see 8. 10, you can't use apostrophes in web addresses and 11, see 7.
So, two actual examples of the way you and Chelsea both wrongly describe Muslims on the whole of the interweb. I'd say that's more than remarkable mate.
Same IP address as Livers - check
Football related username, just like Livers - check
Agrees with everything Livers says - check
First post just happened to be agreeing with Livers - check
Hasn't posted since people brought up the possibility this might be Livers in disguise - check
Writes in a style very similar to Livers - check
Makes the same quirky errors as Livers - check
:spin
BTW - Link 1 no one makes the mistake, they just point out that it is a mistake. 2, they use the word Islams as an indication of more than one Islamic religion, not to describe adherents of the faith. 3, they just forget to use the possessive apostrophe, ie Islam's. 4, that's a question asked 16 hours. Not you is it? 5, describes multiple version of Islam. 6, fair enough. 7, see 3. 8, see 2. 9, see 8. 10, you can't use apostrophes in web addresses and 11, see 7.
So, two actual examples of the way you and Chelsea both wrongly describe Muslims on the whole of the interweb. I'd say that's more than remarkable mate.
Disco08 said:
I've discussed it here before Disco
http://www.puntroadend.com/yabbse/index.php?topic=29963.45
Funny, over a year ago and still people like yourself are bleating about it.
Must be running out of arguments with me if you have to bring this old chestnut up again? :hihi
Disco08 said:
Yes, which begs the question....why point it out if it is only Chelsea and I that supposedly use this term, so much so that you find it 'remarkable'?
Keep digging Disco.
lol, you're the one who posted 11 links to mostly irrelevant sites to support yourself and I'm digging? The link is about a book that corrects heaps of errors, many of which only very few people make, just like calling Muslims Islams.
I only brought it up because you told me you'd already stated your solution for the threat of Islam and didn't want to repost it so I started reading through this thread again trying to find your answers. I thought it was pretty amazing given the list of other 'coincidences'.
I only brought it up because you told me you'd already stated your solution for the threat of Islam and didn't want to repost it so I started reading through this thread again trying to find your answers. I thought it was pretty amazing given the list of other 'coincidences'.
Should we have a vote on the general board? I'll put up the evidence and we'll see how many people think you and Chelsea are two different people.
As for the book - one of their other mistakes is people saying 'cut of tea' instead of 'cup of tea'. See that one all the time too, don't we?
Like I said, it's only remarkable when combined with all the other coincidences. On it's own it wouldn't mean anything.
As for the book - one of their other mistakes is people saying 'cut of tea' instead of 'cup of tea'. See that one all the time too, don't we?
Like I said, it's only remarkable when combined with all the other coincidences. On it's own it wouldn't mean anything.
Disco08 said:Should we have a vote on the general board? I'll put up the evidence and we'll see how many people think you and Chelsea are two different people.
As for the book - one of their other mistakes is people saying 'cut of tea' instead of 'cup of tea'. See that one all the time too, don't we?
Like I said, it's only remarkable when combined with all the other coincidences. On it's own it wouldn't mean anything.
And whats a vote going to prove?
People who agree with me on topics will maybe vote for me...people like you who constantly disagree with my opinions will vote against me.
So your 'vote' won't have anything to do with the said question...it just becomes a popularity vote...and I doubt that I would win that on this forum, but thats fine. I have my opinions and I stand by them.
But if you want to do it...I can't stop you so go for it.
There was a thread about a year ago on the topic and everyone had their say, the 'tester' gave their professional opinion, and the thread was duly closed.
However, if you want to raise this topic again 1 year later...go for it!
Chelsea is a female. I know this for a fact.
Now all it needs is for Livers to prove he is a male.
Case Solved.
Now all it needs is for Livers to prove he is a male.
Case Solved.
poppa x said:
Well, I could drop my drawers and post a HD photo but apart from getting Rosy and the rest of the females all excited mate... :hihi...I'd get myself banned.
However, you better watch out for admitting the fact that you know Chelsea....I didn't even know if it was a he or a she (now we know I guess) so you know more than what I do....so Disco might start accusing you next of being 'her'. :spin
Disco08 said:
Yeah, it was a joke this whole saga....and Liverpool gets the last laugh again :cutelaugh
