agincourt said:On his form at the time we would have got two thirds of stuff all for him anyway.
Every one is a genius with the benefit of hindsight....
Bill James said:Now aint that sweet
Player MT K Avg H Avg D Avg M Avg HO Avg T Avg FF FA G Avg B Ben Nason 10 87 9 42 4 129 13 35 4 0 0 31 3 9 4 9 1 2 Jay Schulz 78 449 6 226 3 675 9 315 4 7 0 123 2 47 44 66 1 48
17 said:Hindsight not required, and I was strongly against the trade at the time.
3/. Why the club would even contemplate trading a key forward who was about to enter his prime is staggering - and for a fat back flanker who was delisted 2 years later.
Hardwick tried his best to unwind this disaster of a trade in his first week at the club but couldn't.
Craig Cameron will wear this one as the worst of many dumb trades on his watch as LM (Farmer, Thompson, Hislop).
GoodOne said:in hindsight if I knew that meant Miller, McGuane, Edwards as he alternatives...well what can you say?
GoodOne said:Not staggering at all. Schulz was a perennial underperformer at the Tigers after 7 years. In the end the trade didn't work out but if you think Schulz would be performing at the Tigers now like he is at Port then I think you're kidding yourself. It was definitely a situation that required a move for him to get his career back on track. Even then if you look at his career since leaving Richmond his first couple of seasons weren't great and he's missed quite a few games through injury. He's now 28 and probably having his best season. And good on him. It wouldn't have happened at Richmond.
Punxsutawney Phil said:We could do with one of those right about now.
17 said:Agreed.
Key forwards dont grow on trees.
Really dumb trade.
Bin him for nought in return just as he is about to mature.
Pappy said:FACT - Terry Wallace was on radio only 2 weeks ago and stated that when he got to the club, Jay Schulz had put in a request to leave and be traded. Schulz was contracted and Wallace didnt want him to go.
mld said:Will be interesting to see how many of our current talls that have been written off manage to have similarly successful rebirths at other AFL clubs.
Ruby said:I bumped into some family members of his on the ferry over to Rotternest WA in about (early) 2006. Pretty sure it was his uncle and aunt. They were on hols. They talked openly about him missing home and wanting to return. Got the impression from that conversation that his heart was never in it at Richmond, wasn't overly comfortable in Melbourne and was looking to return home to SA.
Perhaps with some players it doesn't matter what development the Tigers put into them, they just want to be elsewhere (ie Brad Ottens, Jay schulz). IMHO reflects on their professionalism or lack thereof ... but then again what can be done about a player who just doesn't want to be at the club?
RedanTiger said:bingo!
After Jay was busted for a driving offence he was crucified by all - especially Richmond players, officials and fans, plus the media - for causing the club to lose the TAC sponsorship.
Miller even went so far as to say that he only kept Jay on the list because his parents "begged" him. Nice way to think about your career and family.
He was also butchered by Richo charging over the top of Jay and demanding every entry went to him. Supported by the coaches and fans.
Pappy said:FACT - Terry Wallace was on radio only 2 weeks ago and stated that when he got to the club, Jay Schulz had put in a request to leave and be traded. Schulz was contracted and Wallace didnt want him to go.
Mikee said:The lead-up forward type player has been a deficiency of ours for as long as I can remember...
Stop confusing the argument with pertinent facts.TJsFurrow said:There's a kid called Jack Riewoldt coming through who I have high hopes for. Hopefully he can give us a lead-up option one day.
TJsFurrow said:There's a kid called Jack Riewoldt coming through who I have high hopes for. Hopefully he can give us a lead-up option one day.