Jay Schulz [Merged] | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Jay Schulz [Merged]

agincourt said:
On his form at the time we would have got two thirds of stuff all for him anyway.
Every one is a genius with the benefit of hindsight....

Hindsight not required, and I was strongly against the trade at the time.
1/. Shultz was certainly a late maturer, but undeniably had talent - could certainly take a strong mark, and was a good kick.
2/. Richo was on his last legs. Shultz was the very obvious replacement.
3/. Why the club would even contemplate trading a key forward who was about to enter his prime is staggering - and for a fat back flanker who was delisted 2 years later.
Hardwick tried his best to unwind this disaster of a trade in his first week at the club but couldn't.
Craig Cameron will wear this one as the worst of many dumb trades on his watch as LM (Farmer, Thompson, Hislop).
 
Bill James said:
Player MT K Avg H Avg D Avg M Avg HO Avg T Avg FF FA G Avg B
Ben Nason 10 87 9 42 4 129 13 35 4 0 0 31 3 9 4 9 1 2
Jay Schulz 78 449 6 226 3 675 9 315 4 7 0 123 2 47 44 66 1 48
Now aint that sweet

Got an update for us Bill? :blah

Great post btw 17. Especially the part about Richo retiring.
 
Man, the Jay Schulz thread has more legs than the Jayden Post thread.
 
17 said:
Hindsight not required, and I was strongly against the trade at the time.
3/. Why the club would even contemplate trading a key forward who was about to enter his prime is staggering - and for a fat back flanker who was delisted 2 years later.
Hardwick tried his best to unwind this disaster of a trade in his first week at the club but couldn't.
Craig Cameron will wear this one as the worst of many dumb trades on his watch as LM (Farmer, Thompson, Hislop).

Not staggering at all. Schulz was a perennial underperformer at the Tigers after 7 years. In the end the trade didn't work out but if you think Schulz would be performing at the Tigers now like he is at Port then I think you're kidding yourself. It was definitely a situation that required a move for him to get his career back on track. Even then if you look at his career since leaving Richmond his first couple of seasons weren't great and he's missed quite a few games through injury. He's now 28 and probably having his best season. And good on him. It wouldn't have happened at Richmond.
 
GoodOne said:
Not staggering at all. Schulz was a perennial underperformer at the Tigers after 7 years. In the end the trade didn't work out but if you think Schulz would be performing at the Tigers now like he is at Port then I think you're kidding yourself. It was definitely a situation that required a move for him to get his career back on track. Even then if you look at his career since leaving Richmond his first couple of seasons weren't great and he's missed quite a few games through injury. He's now 28 and probably having his best season. And good on him. It wouldn't have happened at Richmond.

And yet, two players of similar vintage, Daniel Jackson and Matt White, are still at Richmond and are also in career-best form.

Maybe the lesson here is that many players are recruited when they are too young? Many of these players are then discarded after a few years BEFORE they have had a chance to play in the AFL as mature men, rather than as callow teenagers.

You will always get players like Trent Cotchin, Jaeger O’Meara and Chris Judd who are ready for the big-time, both mentally and physically at a young age. The rest are either never going to be good enough or start to come good around 22-23, and play consistent footy for about five years.

Why do teams recruit six 18 year-olds each year and discard half of them before they turn 22? It makes no sense to me. Bringing a player like Schulz to your club at 24 is a very smart move.
 
Punxsutawney Phil said:
We could do with one of those right about now.

The lead-up forward type player has been a deficiency of ours for as long as I can remember...
 
FACT - Terry Wallace was on radio only 2 weeks ago and stated that when he got to the club, Jay Schulz had put in a request to leave and be traded. Schulz was contracted and Wallace didnt want him to go.
In essence, Schulz was never really happy at the club and he was happy to leave at the drop of a hat.
No point speculating or thinking in hindsight. He'd made his decision to leave much much earlier.
 
Pappy said:
FACT - Terry Wallace was on radio only 2 weeks ago and stated that when he got to the club, Jay Schulz had put in a request to leave and be traded. Schulz was contracted and Wallace didnt want him to go.

And he went on to cost us a 16-year major sponsor before playing a game under Wallace.

What's done is done. Schulz was given plenty of chances at Richmond.
 
Will be interesting to see how many of our current talls that have been written off manage to have similarly successful rebirths at other AFL clubs.
 
mld said:
Will be interesting to see how many of our current talls that have been written off manage to have similarly successful rebirths at other AFL clubs.

Heard Posty is killing it down at Altona Vikings at the moment.
 
Ruby said:
I bumped into some family members of his on the ferry over to Rotternest WA in about (early) 2006. Pretty sure it was his uncle and aunt. They were on hols. They talked openly about him missing home and wanting to return. Got the impression from that conversation that his heart was never in it at Richmond, wasn't overly comfortable in Melbourne and was looking to return home to SA.

Perhaps with some players it doesn't matter what development the Tigers put into them, they just want to be elsewhere (ie Brad Ottens, Jay schulz). IMHO reflects on their professionalism or lack thereof ... but then again what can be done about a player who just doesn't want to be at the club?

bingo!

After Jay was busted for a driving offence he was crucified by all - especially Richmond players, officials and fans, plus the media - for causing the club to lose the TAC sponsorship.
Miller even went so far as to say that he only kept Jay on the list because his parents "begged" him. Nice way to think about your career and family.
He was also butchered by Richo charging over the top of Jay and demanding every entry went to him. Supported by the coaches and fans.
 
"but then again what can be done about a player who just doesn't want to be at the club?"


RedanTiger said:
bingo!

After Jay was busted for a driving offence he was crucified by all - especially Richmond players, officials and fans, plus the media - for causing the club to lose the TAC sponsorship.
Miller even went so far as to say that he only kept Jay on the list because his parents "begged" him. Nice way to think about your career and family.
He was also butchered by Richo charging over the top of Jay and demanding every entry went to him. Supported by the coaches and fans.

Plenty can be done.
First and foremost, a new coach coming in can tell the player that he is very much wanted, and will be played every week in one position.
Hardwick did this with Houli, and ShEd, to great success. That's just two we publicly know of in his time at Richmond.
Elsewhere, you may recall Ryan O'Keefe wanted out of Sydney and tried to arrange a trade to Hawthorn.
Because Pelchen tries to screw every club, unsurprisingly a trade couldn't be agreed, so O'Keefe stayed and went on to another premiership last year and is once again a very happy Swan.
More recently, supposedly WCE's Brown was a certainty to be off to StK last year, and then end of this year. Just signed a 3 year deal with WCE.
So don't worry, plenty can be done to change a players mind.
Given Richmond would have had (i) a new coach who wanted Shultz at Richmond and came in with a clean slate, and (ii) Shultz would have been the key forward with Richo out of his way, I think this would have been ideal circumstances to turn Shultzy around for the better.
But our "brains trust" just couldn't see the upside.
Funnily enough, Blair Hartley (then at Port) obviously could.
 
Pappy said:
FACT - Terry Wallace was on radio only 2 weeks ago and stated that when he got to the club, Jay Schulz had put in a request to leave and be traded. Schulz was contracted and Wallace didnt want him to go.

then again not long before terry became our coach he gave jay the spray of all sprays on abc radio...words to the effect he was useless and would never make it as an afl player.
 
Mikee said:
The lead-up forward type player has been a deficiency of ours for as long as I can remember...

There's a kid called Jack Riewoldt coming through who I have high hopes for. Hopefully he can give us a lead-up option one day.
 
TJsFurrow said:
There's a kid called Jack Riewoldt coming through who I have high hopes for. Hopefully he can give us a lead-up option one day.
Stop confusing the argument with pertinent facts. ;)
 
TJsFurrow said:
There's a kid called Jack Riewoldt coming through who I have high hopes for. Hopefully he can give us a lead-up option one day.

At best a third tall forward.