TOT70 said:I thought Schulz played well yesterday but suggestions of BOG are a bit OTT. He had what 10, maybe 11 possessions?
For what it's worth the Age did have him as first in our list of best players
TOT70 said:I thought Schulz played well yesterday but suggestions of BOG are a bit OTT. He had what 10, maybe 11 possessions?
Col.W.Kurtz said:For what it's worth the Age did have him as first in our list of best players
TIGEREXTRA said:I am happy with Sarge yesterday.
Kel Moore needs a mention too, well done.
Bill James said:To be honest I liked sarges game last week in the backline better than todays game.
zips said:It's not that Sarge isn't presenting his own leads or jumping into Richo's packs. Our dumb, tunnel visioned mids are the ones to blame, who only see Richo, Richo, Richo. If they lifted their bloody eyes & actually took a fraction of a second longer to pick the better option, they would usually find that Sarge has offered that better option.
BladeTiger said:Tend to agree that the Sarge looks better in defence. I forget exactly when but in one passage of play out of defence he hit a target kicking with his opposite foot. Not a match winning passage of play I admit, but I can't remember the last time I have seen a tall Tiger defender that can:
(a) consistently hit targets by foot
(b) kick with both feet accurately
Putting him into the forward line yesterday was a bit like robbing Peter to pay Paul. Sure he kicked a few nice goals (nice leap over the pack for one), but our defence missed his presence also. Agree that it was ridiculous the way our midfield knows no other strategy than "kick it to Richo" with a 4 to 1 contest.
Morton in, not Jack, for Hugheslamb22 said:I think floating between half back and forward is Jay's go. He gets into the game at half back and can hurt you up forward. I think Polak and Jay can alternate between those positions.
I thought our defence was OK considering the deluge they were under. Moore Thursty and Polak provided 21 one % between them - worked very hard. Our smaller backs had more of a mixed day.
I think Riewoldt needs to come in - also versatile who can play forward and back. Cleve is very one dimensional and on yesterday's kicking none dimensional!
lamb22 said:I think floating between half back and forward is Jay's go. He gets into the game at half back and can hurt you up forward. I think Polak and Jay can alternate between those positions.
I thought our defence was OK considering the deluge they were under. Moore Thursty and Polak provided 21 one % between them - worked very hard. Our smaller backs had more of a mixed day.
I think Riewoldt needs to come in - also versatile who can play forward and back. Cleve is very one dimensional and on yesterday's kicking none dimensional!
Hayfever said:Morton in, not Jack, for Hughes
Bill James said:Preferred Hughes game, he is starting to present in the right places and throw a bit of weight around.
hughes has had just two games imo hes done enough. lets give him a block of 5 and then evaluate what hes done and what he needs to work onTigers of Old said:LOL ok I'll bite. ;D
You have got to be shitting us Bill? There's bias and then there's bias. Better game from Cleve??? :stir
If Jay Schulz had been in Cleve Hughes's jumper yesterday you would have bagged the absolute daylights out of him for low possessions, low goals and low conversion.
Hughes will likely be dropped this week.
Tigers of Old said:LOL ok I'll bite. ;D
You have got to be shitting us Bill? There's bias and then there's bias. Better game from Cleve??? :stir
If Jay Schulz had been in Cleve Hughes's jumper yesterday you would have bagged the absolute daylights out of him for low possessions, low goals and low conversion.
Hughes will likely be dropped this week.
Bill James said:As to bagging schulz if he had a game like Hughes, I think you will find I was a good supporter of Sarges potential deep into his third year. Hughes is only just starting his third year.