Jay Schulz [Merged] | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Jay Schulz [Merged]

crackertiger said:
It's a Wizard of Oz forward line.

Richo = Scare Crow (gets the stuffing knocked out of him)
Schulz = Tin Man (rusty can't run)
Brown = Dorothy (good looking broad)
Pettifer = Lion (no courage)
Krakouer = Toto (goes missing)


If they only had a brain! :hihi

:rofl
 
collwood90 said:
Schulz is in the Jason Blake, Courtney Johns catergory. sh!t!! If Richmond dont delist him to make more space for Riewoldt then Richmond may as well engrave the next 2 or 3 wooden spoons in. Has done nothing but cost the club its sponsorship.

Why delist the sarg , please name me one forward who we have had in the last 10 years that has shown anything whilst playing second fiddle to Mathew " kick it to me " Richardson .....
Time to start planning for life after Mathew , how about we keep everyone else and retire Richo , then we might see a foward life with more than one option ..... but then again we might need someone in the middle field who might have the ability to honor a lead lace out chest high , not 30 degrees to the left ankle high !!!
 
as much as jay has shown very little you just need to set your minds back to the eagles game when we thought it was finally the start of the future forward 50 without richo and it looked very good

he kicks straight that day and the rfc finally moves forward, instead he misses 4 easy shots and gets himself stuck at coburg for a month and we go back to a richo centric forward line
 
Said it for a while ToO lets get the 3 headed monster roaring Sarge,Jack,Steamer play em all next year and let them learn an form a good partnership...no critisism of Richo but lets get him out of the forward 50 an let the kids learn...maybe play Polly on the CHF's an let Richo play Polly's role
 
CC TIGER said:
Said it for a while ToO lets get the 3 headed monster roaring Sarge,Jack,Steamer play em all next year and let them learn an form a good partnership...no critisism of Richo but lets get him out of the forward 50 an let the kids learn...maybe play Polly on the CHF's an let Richo play Polly's role

How would Richo go at CHB...? Big motor, strong, takes a grab - not a bad idea.
 
Freezer said:
CC TIGER said:
Said it for a while ToO lets get the 3 headed monster roaring Sarge,Jack,Steamer play em all next year and let them learn an form a good partnership...no critisism of Richo but lets get him out of the forward 50 an let the kids learn...maybe play Polly on the CHF's an let Richo play Polly's role

How would Richo go at CHB...? Big motor, strong, takes a grab - not a bad idea.
I wouldnt want him to cost Polly development Freezer so I would try an play him loose in the role Polly has been playing
 
CC TIGER said:
lets get the 3 headed monster roaring Sarge,Jack,Steamer play em all next year and let them learn an form a good partnership...no critisism of Richo but lets get him out of the forward 50 an let the kids learn

True enough CC.
Whilst none of these kids are fit to tie Richo's bootlaces yet, the sum of three parts is greater than one.

Now when all is lost is the time to plant the new seed.
 
CC TIGER said:
Said it for a while ToO lets get the 3 headed monster roaring Sarge,Jack,Steamer play em all next year and let them learn an form a good partnership...no critisism of Richo but lets get him out of the forward 50 an let the kids learn...maybe play Polly on the CHF's an let Richo play Polly's role
perhaps a trade then cc richo would still get us a first rounder.
 
collwood90 said:
Schulz is in the Jason Blake, Courtney Johns catergory. sh!t!! If Richmond dont delist him to make more space for Riewoldt then Richmond may as well engrave the next 2 or 3 wooden spoons in. Has done nothing but cost the club its sponsorship.

Ah that's right. That's the category that also includes Rusling, Richards, Dawes. Bryan amongst others...they're all pretty *smile* as well now you mention it.
 
Rockster said:
Why delist the sarg , please name me one forward who we have had in the last 10 years that has shown anything whilst playing second fiddle to Mathew " kick it to me " Richardson .....

Jack and Cleve
 
Bill James said:
Rockster said:
Why delist the sarg , please name me one forward who we have had in the last 10 years that has shown anything whilst playing second fiddle to Mathew " kick it to me " Richardson .....

Jack and Cleve
Agree,they've shown more in a handful of games than Schulz has the whole time he's been here.
 
BrisTiger24 said:
collwood90 said:
Schulz is in the Jason Blake, Courtney Johns catergory. sh!t!! If Richmond dont delist him to make more space for Riewoldt then Richmond may as well engrave the next 2 or 3 wooden spoons in. Has done nothing but cost the club its sponsorship.

Ah that's right. That's the category that also includes Rusling, Richards, Dawes. Bryan amongst others...they're all pretty sh!t as well now you mention it.

rusling and dawes are kids

richards and bryan no doubt
 
mb64 said:
Bill James said:
Rockster said:
Why delist the sarg , please name me one forward who we have had in the last 10 years that has shown anything whilst playing second fiddle to Mathew " kick it to me " Richardson .....

Jack and Cleve
Agree,they've shown more in a handful of games than Schulz has the whole time he's been here.
Agree Jack
Disagree Cleve.
 
Its simple - 5 years and no marked improvement, development or results.

Over him ............ Yes he has talent but Moreso he is a lazy underachiever without intensity and overated.

Trade or Delist. (no more *smile* around)
 
Why not give him the rest of the season at full-back or CHB, let Polak take the other, and play Joel up the ground more, and Raines as the loose-man/sweeper?

The thing with Schulz is that he is still young and hasn't played a lot of footy due to injury and the like, and I think he can do something for us.

Remember Lepptisch was hit-&-miss up forward and then moved to CHB and became an integral part of one of the greatest teams in history.

Not saying Schulz will be just as good in this new role, but its worth a try until the end of the season....plus I hate investing time/money into a player that hasn't even made it to the prime of his career.
 
mb64 said:
Agree,they've shown more in a handful of games than Schulz has the whole time he's been here.
Without defending Jay too much I wasn't aware either of these guys had kicked a bag of six yet.
Happy to be proven wrong though.

Riewoldt is encouraging so is Hughes to a lesser extent but neither at this stage have shown that they will be any better long term than Jay.

Besides who cares which of these three kids are better or worse.
I'd like to see all three of them in the forward line when Richo departs.
 
Oldie my dear Man Please NO

As one of my favourite and respected posters mate please do not fall into defending Jay for that one game FFS. Thats for those who well ......................... youre much better than that. ;)

Dont do it again. :police:

;D