There's been a bit of a myth on here that he's a bad kick. I haven't really seen it.93% disposal efficiency is insane.
There's been a bit of a myth on here that he's a bad kick. I haven't really seen it.93% disposal efficiency is insane.
No me either. Even his AFL game this year he went 12 effective disposals out of 14 despite 8 contested possies.There's been a bit of a myth on here that he's a bad kick. I haven't really seen it.
I reckon Banks is getting a full game this week which will make it difficult to bring in Trezise as well.I get it mate.
I've put elsewhere, I'd like to bring him in (immediately) down back, and potentially move Short up forward or Rioli to a wing to get some speed in the middle.
Yze seems conservative though, so I don't think he's finished if he doesn't get in.
I agree Sin.I reckon Banks is getting a full game this week which will make it difficult to bring in Trezise as well.
Difficult, yes. I agree.I reckon Banks is getting a full game this week which will make it difficult to bring in Trezise as well.
Why would it be difficult to bring in an inform player when we have so many out of form in the seniors? Sorry i don't get the logic.I reckon Banks is getting a full game this week which will make it difficult to bring in Trezise as well.
He’s duffed a few kicks (who hasn’t!) so now he’s trying very hard to be safe and not turn it over.There's been a bit of a myth on here that he's a bad kick. I haven't really seen it.
I thought he was supposed to be a defender. Not sure we need another loose man in defense.He did what he wanted at will on Sunday. Not sure he even had an opponent. He's the goods. Has to get a game.
Agree with thisHe’s duffed a few kicks (who hasn’t!) so now he’s trying very hard to be safe and not turn it over.
He is a defender, that's just how it felt watching that particular game. But I wouldn't say that was his operandi in previous games, he's soundly beaten opponents. And certainly wasn't the 2 times he played AFL. Thoroughly deserves to be selected imo but it means making a tough decision (well not really tough imo) on one of the more senior playersI thought he was supposed to be a defender. Not sure we need another loose man in defense.
This sounds like an argument for him not to get a game. Especially when playing against the fourths
Drop Short and give Brown or Banks or Sonsie the rebounding role. Easy, but Yze won't make the easy call. Let's get someone that can actually defend into the side.He is a defender, that's just how it felt watching that particular game. But I wouldn't say that was his operandi in previous games, he's soundly beaten opponents. And certainly wasn't the 2 times he played AFL. Thoroughly deserves to be selected imo but it means making a tough decision (well not really tough imo) on one of the more senior players
Yep.Drop Short and give Brown or Banks or Sonsie the rebounding role. Easy, but Yze won't make the easy call. Let's get someone that can actually defend into the side.
Played as Forward in the bush growing up. RFC teaches players to learn the defensive side of their game first . It's a 2 year apprenticeship.I thought he was supposed to be a defender. Not sure we need another loose man in defense.
This sounds like an argument for him not to get a game. Especially when playing against the fourths
Just to allay your concerns about his one-on-one defensive ability, a couple of the recent VFL reports from Morris:I thought he was supposed to be a defender. Not sure we need another loose man in defense.
This sounds like an argument for him not to get a game. Especially when playing against the fourths
We're not.I realise we need to remain competitive.
Early in his VFL career he played forward for a game or two and was outstanding. Townsend role, replacing Cumbersome?He is a defender,